Potak Harrison, Iobst Christopher A
University of Central Florida College of Medicine.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 May/Jun;39(5):237-240. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000929.
Previous literature has demonstrated that pediatric orthopaedic patients with private insurance have less difficulty obtaining appointments than those with Medicaid. Not all injuries of an orthopaedic nature, however, require specialist care. This study evaluated the willingness of pediatricians to provide care for minor orthopaedic injuries and whether or not the patient's insurance status influenced the decision to provide care.
Ninety-nine pediatric primary care offices were randomly selected from 2 regions in Florida. Each office was contacted twice, 2 to 3 months apart, and presented with a fictionalized account of a patient that had sustained a torus ("buckle") fracture of the distal radius. In the first call, the patient was presented as having private insurance, and in the second call as having Medicaid insurance. If the patient was denied an appointment, the reason was recorded.
Of the 99 offices, 100% were willing to treat the patient's injury if the child had private insurance, compared with 76% if the child had Medicaid. All Medicaid patient refusals were based on the insurance status of the patient. No office refused to see the patient due to the nature of the injury. Ninety-four percent of offices in South Florida were willing to see the Medicaid patient, compared with 58% in Central Florida. These differences were statistically significant (P<0.0001).
It was previously unknown whether pediatricians felt comfortable managing minor orthopaedic injuries. This study demonstrates that 100% of the pediatricians surveyed were willing to treat a child with a distal radius buckle fracture with proper insurance. This information potentially can provide additional avenues for patients to achieve timely access to care. However, as seen in previous studies, there was a statistically significant difference in access to care for the same child with Medicaid. Until reimbursement rates for Medicaid improve, these patients will continue to have difficulty obtaining access to care to both primary care providers and specialists.
Prospective survey study.
既往文献表明,拥有私人保险的儿科骨科患者在预约就诊方面比拥有医疗补助保险的患者困难更少。然而,并非所有骨科性质的损伤都需要专科护理。本研究评估了儿科医生为轻度骨科损伤提供护理的意愿,以及患者的保险状况是否会影响提供护理的决定。
从佛罗里达州的2个地区随机选取99个儿科初级保健诊所。每个诊所在相隔2至3个月的时间里被联系两次,并向其呈现一个虚构的病例,该病例为一名桡骨远端青枝骨折的患者。在第一次联系时,告知患者拥有私人保险;在第二次联系时,告知患者拥有医疗补助保险。如果患者被拒绝预约,记录其原因。
在这99个诊所中,如果患儿拥有私人保险,100%的诊所愿意治疗该患儿的损伤;如果患儿拥有医疗补助保险,这一比例为76%。所有拒绝医疗补助保险患者的情况均基于患者的保险状况。没有诊所以损伤的性质为由拒绝为患者看病。南佛罗里达州94%的诊所愿意接待拥有医疗补助保险的患者,而中佛罗里达州这一比例为58%。这些差异具有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。
此前尚不清楚儿科医生对处理轻度骨科损伤是否感到放心。本研究表明,100%接受调查的儿科医生愿意为有适当保险的桡骨远端青枝骨折患儿进行治疗。这一信息可能为患者及时获得治疗提供更多途径。然而,正如之前的研究所显示的,拥有医疗补助保险的同一患儿在获得治疗方面存在统计学上的显著差异。在医疗补助保险的报销率提高之前,这些患者在获得初级保健提供者和专科医生的治疗方面仍将面临困难。
前瞻性调查研究。