Suppr超能文献

微锥形基台实验用螺钉的失效概率、应力分布及断裂分析

Failure Probability, Stress Distribution and Fracture Analysis of Experimental Screw for Micro Conical Abutment.

作者信息

Melo Filho Antonio Braulino de, Tribst João Paulo Mendes, Ramos Nathália de Carvalho, Luz Julio Nogueira, Jardini Maria Aparecida Neves, Borges Alexandre Luiz Souto, Santamaria Mauro Pedrine, Melo Renata Marques de

机构信息

Department of Social and Pediatric Dentistry, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2019 Mar-Apr;30(2):157-163. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201902401. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the failure probability of two types of abutment screws after compressive load and to analyze the stress distribution with finite element method. Sixty (60) single-tooth implant restorations were assembled on titanium implants (e-fix, A.S. Technology - Titanium Fix). The groups were divided into Conventional screw (Screw neck 1.5 ø mm) and Experimental screw (Screw neck constricted with 1.2 ø mm). Specimens were subjected to single load to failure with compressive test according ISO 14801. The fractured specimens were subjected to stereomicroscopy for measurement of remaining screws inside the implant and characterization of fracture origin. Representative specimens were analyzed by scanning electronic microscopy. For finite element method (FEM), an identical 3D model of the two in vitro test groups were used with similar conditions (30º, 100 N load). The stress in the abutment screw was analyzed by von-Mises criteria. The results of strength means were 4132.5 ± 76 MPa and 4528.2 ± 127.2 for conventional and experimental groups, respectively. During microscopy, the mean (mm) of the remaining screw piece inside the implants were 0.97 ± 0.23 and 1.32 ± 0.12 for conventional and experimental groups, respectively. In FEM, the conventional group showed stress concentered in an unfavorable region (peak of 39.23 MPa), while the experimental group showed more stress areas but less concentration than the conventional group (36.6 MPa). In using the tested experimental geometry, the abutment screw can have its strength improved, and the origin of failure can be more favorable to clinical resolution.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估两种基台螺丝在压缩载荷后的失效概率,并采用有限元方法分析应力分布。在钛种植体(e-fix,A.S. Technology - Titanium Fix)上组装了60个单颗牙种植修复体。这些组被分为传统螺丝组(螺丝颈部直径1.5毫米)和实验螺丝组(螺丝颈部直径缩窄为1.2毫米)。根据ISO 14801进行压缩试验,对样本施加单次载荷直至失效。对断裂的样本进行体视显微镜检查,以测量种植体内剩余螺丝的长度,并确定断裂起源的特征。对代表性样本进行扫描电子显微镜分析。对于有限元方法(FEM),使用了与体外测试的两个组相同的3D模型,并设置了相似的条件(30°,100 N载荷)。根据冯·米塞斯准则分析基台螺丝中的应力。传统组和实验组的强度均值分别为4132.5±76 MPa和4528.2±127.2。在显微镜检查中,传统组和实验组种植体内剩余螺丝段的平均长度(毫米)分别为0.97±0.23和1.32±0.12。在有限元分析中,传统组的应力集中在一个不利区域(峰值为39.23 MPa),而实验组的应力区域更多,但应力集中程度低于传统组(36.6 MPa)。采用经过测试的实验几何形状,基台螺丝的强度可以得到提高,并且失效起源对临床解决更为有利。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验