Uy Angelique Bea C, Ramos Everly Faith P, Rivera Adovich S, Maghuyop Norman L, Suratos Cezar Thomas R, Miguel Red Thaddeus D, Gaddi Mairre James S, Zaldivar Joan Kristi D
Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines -Manila, Philippines.
Institute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines - Manila, Philippines.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019 Mar;31(1):79-85. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190012.
We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of unplanned extubation among adult patients.
We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult intubated patients admitted to the charity wards of a government tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines. Patients managed in both intensive care and nonintensive care settings were included. Patients were followed-up until discharge or until seven days postextubation.
The outcomes of the 191 included patients were planned extubation (35%), unplanned extubation (19%), death (39%), and discharge against advice (7%). Competing risk regression showed that male sex (Crude OR: 2.25, 95%CI: 1.10 - 4.63) and age (Crude OR 0.976, 95%CI: 0.957 - 0.996) were significant baseline factors. The night shift (Crude OR: 24.6, 95%CI: 2.87 - 211) was also consistently associated with more unplanned extubations. Among postextubation outcomes, reintubation (unplanned extubation: 61.1% versus planned extubation: 25.4%), acute respiratory failure (unplanned extubation: 38.9% versus planned extubation: 17.5%), and cardiovascular events (unplanned extubation: 8.33% versus planned extubation: 1.49%) occurred significantly more often among the unplanned extubation patients. Admission in an intensive care unit was not associated with a lower risk of unplanned extubation (Crude OR 1.15, 95%CI: 0.594 - 2.21).
Many intubated patients had unplanned extubation. Patients admitted in nonintensive care unit settings did not have significantly higher odds of unplanned extubation.
我们旨在确定成年患者非计划拔管的发生率、危险因素及结局。
我们对入住菲律宾一家政府三级教学医院慈善病房的成年插管患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。纳入在重症监护和非重症监护环境中接受治疗的患者。对患者进行随访直至出院或拔管后7天。
191例纳入患者的结局包括计划拔管(35%)、非计划拔管(19%)、死亡(39%)和违反医嘱出院(7%)。竞争风险回归显示,男性(粗比值比:2.25,95%置信区间:1.10 - 4.63)和年龄(粗比值比0.976,95%置信区间:0.957 - 0.996)是显著的基线因素。夜班(粗比值比:24.6,95%置信区间:2.87 - 211)也一直与更多的非计划拔管相关。在拔管后结局中,再次插管(非计划拔管:61.1% 对比计划拔管:25.4%)、急性呼吸衰竭(非计划拔管:38.9% 对比计划拔管:17.5%)和心血管事件(非计划拔管:8.33% 对比计划拔管:1.49%)在非计划拔管患者中发生的频率明显更高。入住重症监护病房与非计划拔管风险较低无关(粗比值比1.15,95%置信区间:0.594 - 2.21)。
许多插管患者发生了非计划拔管。入住非重症监护病房的患者非计划拔管几率并没有显著更高。