Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
World J Surg. 2019 Aug;43(8):2006-2015. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05000-3.
Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), used for treatment of patients with an initial diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer, has led to unsatisfactory long-term prognosis. Moreover, CRT can lead to esophageal fistula, perforation, and strictures. Therefore, strong induction chemotherapeutic treatments are necessary to reduce the tumor volume for subsequent radical esophagectomy. This study aimed to determine the oncological utility of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) and the technical feasibility of subsequent esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
Eighty-seven patients with clinical borderline unresectable T3 and T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without distant metastases were included in this study. There were 44 patients in primary DCF group and 43 patients in definitive CRT group, and perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Twenty-two patients (50%) achieved R0 resection in the DCF group. Albeit not significant, the rate of curative treatment was higher in the DCF group than the definitive CRT group (p = 0.099). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were better with DCF than with definitive CRT (median OS, 29 vs. 17 months, p = 0.206; median PFS, 10 vs. 6 months, p = 0.020). Specifically, the OS of patients with a Charlson score of less than 3 among the DCF-treated patients tended to be better than those among the definitive CRT-treated patients.
DCF and subsequent esophagectomy achieved R0 resection in 50% of the patients and was associated with better long-term oncological outcomes in patients with initially unresectable esophageal cancer if their systemic status is acceptable.
对于初始诊断为不可切除局部晚期食管癌的患者,采用确定性放化疗(CRT)治疗,导致长期预后不理想。此外,CRT 可导致食管瘘、穿孔和狭窄。因此,为了随后进行根治性食管切除术,需要进行强烈的诱导化疗以缩小肿瘤体积。本研究旨在确定多西他赛加顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶(DCF)的肿瘤学效用,以及对局部晚期食管癌进行后续食管切除术的技术可行性。
本研究纳入了 87 例临床边界不可切除的 T3 和 T4 食管鳞癌且无远处转移的患者。其中 44 例患者为初始 DCF 组,43 例患者为确定性 CRT 组,比较两组患者的围手术期和长期肿瘤学结果。
在 DCF 组中,有 22 例(50%)患者达到了 R0 切除。尽管没有统计学意义,但 DCF 组的根治性治疗率高于确定性 CRT 组(p=0.099)。与确定性 CRT 相比,DCF 组的总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)更好(中位 OS:29 个月 vs. 17 个月,p=0.206;中位 PFS:10 个月 vs. 6 个月,p=0.020)。具体而言,在 DCF 治疗的患者中,Charlson 评分小于 3 的患者的 OS 似乎优于确定性 CRT 治疗的患者。
对于系统状况可接受的初始不可切除食管癌患者,DCF 联合后续食管切除术可实现 50%的 R0 切除,并可获得更好的长期肿瘤学结果。