Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Jul;195(7):677-687. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01460-7. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
Current research approaches in lymphoma focus on reduction of therapy-associated long-term side effects. Especially in mediastinal lymphoma, proton beam radiotherapy (PT) may be a promising approach for reducing the dose to organs at risk (OAR).
In total, 20 patients were irradiated with active scanning PT at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) between September 2014 and February 2017. For comparative analysis, additional photon irradiation plans with helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were calculated and quantitative and qualitative dose evaluations were made for both treatment modalities. Toxicity and survival outcomes were evaluated.
Clinical target volume coverage was comparable in both treatment modalities and did not significantly differ between IMRT and PT. Nevertheless, PT showed superiority regarding the homogeneity index (HI = 1.041 vs. HI = 1.075, p < 0.001). For all OAR, PT showed significantly higher dose reductions compared with IMRT. In particular, the dose to the heart was reduced in PT (absolute dose reduction of D of 3.3 Gy [all patients] and 4.2 Gy [patients with pericardial involvement]). Likewise, the subgroup analysis of female patients, who were expected to receive higher doses to the breast, showed a higher dose reduction in D of 1.2 Gy (right side) and 2.2 Gy (left side). After a median follow-up of 32 months (range 21-48 months), local and distant progression free survival (LPFS and DPFS) were 95.5% and 95.0%, respectively. Radiotherapy was tolerated well with only mild (grade 1-2) radiation-induced acute and chronic side effects.
A significant reduction in the dose to the surrounding OAR was achieved with PT compared with photon irradiation, without compromising target volume coverage. Dosimetric advantages may have the potential to translate into a reduction of long-term radiation-induced toxicity in young patients with malignant lymphoma of the mediastinum.
目前淋巴瘤的研究方法侧重于减少治疗相关的长期副作用。特别是在纵隔淋巴瘤中,质子束放疗(PT)可能是降低危及器官(OAR)剂量的一种有前途的方法。
2014 年 9 月至 2017 年 2 月期间,共有 20 名患者在海德堡离子束治疗中心(HIT)接受主动扫描 PT 放疗。为了进行比较分析,还计算了额外的光子照射计划,采用螺旋强度调制放疗(IMRT),并对两种治疗方式进行了定量和定性剂量评估。评估了毒性和生存结果。
两种治疗方式的临床靶区覆盖率相当,IMRT 和 PT 之间没有显著差异。然而,PT 在均匀性指数(HI=1.041 与 HI=1.075,p<0.001)方面具有优势。对于所有 OAR,PT 与 IMRT 相比,剂量降低更为显著。特别是,PT 中心脏的剂量降低(所有患者的 D 剂量绝对减少 3.3Gy,心包受累患者的 D 剂量减少 4.2Gy)。同样,在预期会受到更高乳房剂量照射的女性患者亚组分析中,右侧和左侧的 D 剂量分别减少 1.2Gy 和 2.2Gy。在中位数为 32 个月(范围 21-48 个月)的随访后,局部和远处无进展生存(LPFS 和 DPFS)分别为 95.5%和 95.0%。放疗耐受性良好,仅出现轻度(1-2 级)放射性急性和慢性不良反应。
与光子照射相比,PT 可显著降低周围 OAR 的剂量,同时不影响靶区覆盖。剂量学优势可能有潜力降低纵隔恶性淋巴瘤年轻患者的长期放射性毒性。