• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

县一级的手术使用差异与 I-II 期胰腺腺癌的癌症特异性生存

County-level Variation in Use of Surgery and Cancer-specific Survival for Stage I-II Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Surgical Services Clinical Program, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):1102-1109. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003236.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003236
PMID:30973391
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to describe county-level variation in use of surgery for stage I-II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the association between county surgery rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

BACKGROUND

The degree of small geographic area variation in use of surgery for stage I-II PDAC and the association between area surgery rates and CSS remain incompletely defined.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18 to 80 years in the 2007 to 2015 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with stage I-II PDAC without contraindications to surgery or refusal. Multilevel models were used to characterize county-level variation in use of surgery and CSS. County-specific risk- and reliability-adjusted surgery rates and CSS rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 18,100 patients living in 581 counties, 10,944 (60.5%) underwent surgery. Adjusted county-specific surgery rates varied 1.5-fold from 49.9% to 74.6%. Median CSS increased in a graded fashion from 13 months [interquartile range (IQR) 13-14] in counties with surgery rates of 49.9% to 56.9% to 18 months (IQR 17-19) in counties with surgery rates of 68.0% to 74.6%. Results were similar in multivariable analyses. Adjusted county 18-month CSS rates varied 1.6-fold from 32.7% to 53.7%. Adjusted county surgery and 18-month CSS rates were correlated (r = 0.54; P < 0.001) and county surgery rates explained approximately half of county-level variation in CSS. Only 18 (3.1%) counties had adjusted surgery rates of 68.0% to 74.6%, which was associated with the longest CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

County-specific rates of surgery varied substantially, and patients living in areas with higher surgery rates lived longer. These data suggest that increasing use of surgery in stage I-II PDAC could lead to improvements in survival.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述 I 期- II 期胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)手术使用的县级差异以及县手术率与癌症特异性生存(CSS)之间的关联。

背景

I 期- II 期 PDAC 手术使用的小地理区域差异程度以及区域手术率与 CSS 之间的关联仍未完全确定。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2007 年至 2015 年监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中年龄在 18 至 80 岁之间、无手术禁忌证或拒绝手术的 I 期- II 期 PDAC 患者。使用多水平模型描述手术使用和 CSS 的县级差异。计算了县级特异性风险和可靠性调整后的手术率和 CSS 率。

结果

在 581 个县的 18100 名患者中,有 10944 名(60.5%)接受了手术。调整后的县级特异性手术率从 49.9%到 74.6%不等,差异达 1.5 倍。CSS 中位数呈梯度增加,从手术率为 49.9%至 56.9%的县的 13 个月[四分位距(IQR)13-14]增加到手术率为 68.0%至 74.6%的县的 18 个月(IQR 17-19)。多变量分析结果相似。调整后的县 18 个月 CSS 率从 32.7%到 53.7%不等,差异达 1.6 倍。调整后的县手术和 18 个月 CSS 率呈正相关(r = 0.54;P < 0.001),县手术率解释了 CSS 县级差异的大约一半。只有 18 个(3.1%)县的调整手术率为 68.0%至 74.6%,这与最长的 CSS 相关。

结论

县级特异性手术率差异很大,接受手术的患者生存时间更长。这些数据表明,在 I 期- II 期 PDAC 中增加手术的使用可能会提高生存率。

相似文献

1
County-level Variation in Use of Surgery and Cancer-specific Survival for Stage I-II Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.县一级的手术使用差异与 I-II 期胰腺腺癌的癌症特异性生存
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):1102-1109. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003236.
2
Development and validation of novel nomograms for predicting the survival of patients after surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.开发和验证用于预测胰腺导管腺癌患者手术后生存的新型列线图。
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(10):3353-3370. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2959. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Hospital-level Variation in Utilization of Surgery for Clinical Stage I-II Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.临床Ⅰ期-Ⅱ期胰腺癌手术治疗利用的医院间差异。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):133-142. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002404.
4
Pancreatectomy predicts improved survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of an instrumental variable analysis.胰腺切除术可预测胰腺腺癌患者生存率的提高:工具变量分析结果
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):740-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000796.
5
The Impact of Tumor Location on Resection and Survival for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.肿瘤位置对胰腺导管腺癌切除和生存的影响。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jul;239:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.061. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic and open pancreatectomy in a national cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.全国胰腺癌队列中机器人和开放胰腺切除术的长期肿瘤学结果。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;122(2):234-242. doi: 10.1002/jso.25958. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
Mesenterico-portal vein invasion should be an important factor in TNM staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Proposed modification of the 8 edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.肠系膜门静脉侵犯应成为胰腺导管腺癌 TNM 分期的一个重要因素:美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版分期系统的修改建议。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 14;25(46):6752-6766. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6752.
8
Invasive IPMN and MCN: same organ, different outcomes?浸润性胰腺导管内乳头状黏液瘤(IPMN)和黏液性囊腺瘤(MCN):同一器官,不同结局?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Feb;18(2):345-51. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1309-4. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
9
Adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry.辅助放疗治疗胰腺浸润性导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤:监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(4):1316-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2088-2. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
10
Survival after resection for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional comparison according to American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage.浸润性导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤和胰腺腺癌切除术后的生存:根据美国癌症联合委员会分期的多机构比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Aug;213(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Vulnerability as a Neighborhood-Level Determinant of Pancreatic Cancer Survivorship: A National Analysis of Veterans Affairs Patients.社会脆弱性作为邻里层面胰腺癌生存的决定因素:对退伍军人事务部患者的全国性分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18232-6.
2
Intraoperative liquid biopsy as a tool for detecting R1 resection during pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: the CETUPANC trial (part II).术中液体活检作为检测胰腺癌患者胰十二指肠切除术中R1切除的工具:CETUPANC试验(第二部分)
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):7798-7805. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002153.
3
Geographical Distribution of Pancreatic Cancer in the State of Mississippi by Incidence and Mortality From 2003 to 2019.
2003年至2019年密西西比州胰腺癌按发病率和死亡率的地理分布情况
Cureus. 2022 Nov 17;14(11):e31605. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31605. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Clinical Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma Compared to Ductal Adenocarcinoma-Results from the German Cancer Registry Group.与导管腺癌相比,胰腺腺鳞癌的临床结局和预后因素——来自德国癌症登记组的结果
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 16;14(16):3946. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163946.
5
Systematic review of the predictors of health service use in pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌医疗服务利用预测因素的系统评价。
Am J Cancer Res. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):622-650. eCollection 2022.