• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光辅助与手动后弹力层内皮角膜移植术的三年疗效比较

Three-Year Outcome Comparison Between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Manual Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

作者信息

Sorkin Nir, Mednick Zale, Einan-Lifshitz Adi, Trinh Tanya, Santaella Gisella, Telli Alexandre, Chan Clara C, Rootman David S

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Ophthalmology Department, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

Cornea. 2019 Jul;38(7):812-816. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001956.

DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001956
PMID:30973405
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate 3-year outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (F-DMEK) compared with manual Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (M-DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

METHODS

A retrospective, interventional study, including eyes with FECD and cataract that underwent either F-DMEK or M-DMEK combined with cataract extraction at either the Toronto Western Hospital or Kensington Eye Institute, and that had at least 18 months' follow-up was conducted.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

complicated anterior segments, previous vitrectomy, previous keratoplasty, corneal opacity, or any other visually significant ocular comorbidity.

RESULTS

Included were 16 eyes of 15 patients in the F-DMEK group (average follow-up 33.0 ± 9.0 months) and 45 eyes of 40 patients in the M-DMEK group (average follow-up 32.0 ± 7.0 months). There were no issues with the creation of femtosecond descemetorhexis (in the F-DMEK group)-all descemetorhexis cuts were complete. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improvement did not differ significantly between the groups at 1, 2, and 3 years (P = 0.849, P = 0.465 and P = 0.936, respectively). Rates of significant detachment in F-DMEK and M-DMEK were 1 of 16 eyes (6.25%) and 16 of 45 eyes (35.6%) (P = 0.027). Rebubbling rates were 1 of 16 eyes (6.25%) and 15 of 45 eyes (33.3%) (P = 0.047). Cell-loss rates following F-DMEK and M-DMEK were 26.8% and 36.5% at 1 year (P = 0.042), 30.5% and 42.3% at 2 years (P = 0.008), 37% and 47.5% at 3 years (P = 0.057), respectively. Graft failure rate was 0% in F-DMEK and 8.9% in M-DMEK (all were primary failures; P = 0.565).

CONCLUSIONS

F-DMEK showed good efficacy with reduced detachment, rebubble, and cell-loss rates, compared with M-DMEK.

摘要

目的

评估飞秒激光辅助Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术(F-DMEK)与手动Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术(M-DMEK)治疗Fuchs内皮性角膜营养不良(FECD)患者的3年疗效。

方法

进行一项回顾性干预研究,纳入在多伦多西部医院或肯辛顿眼科研究所接受F-DMEK或M-DMEK联合白内障摘除术且患有FECD和白内障的眼睛,并进行至少18个月的随访。

排除标准

前段复杂、既往玻璃体切除术、既往角膜移植术、角膜混浊或任何其他具有明显视觉影响的眼部合并症。

结果

F-DMEK组纳入15例患者的16只眼(平均随访33.0±9.0个月),M-DMEK组纳入40例患者的45只眼(平均随访32.0±7.0个月)。飞秒撕除Descemet膜(F-DMEK组)过程中无问题——所有Descemet膜撕除均完整。两组在1年、2年和3年时最佳矫正视力改善情况无显著差异(P分别为0.849、0.465和0.936)。F-DMEK组和M-DMEK组的显著脱离率分别为16只眼中的1只(6.25%)和45只眼中的16只(35.6%)(P = 0.027)。再气泡形成率分别为16只眼中的1只(6.25%)和45只眼中的15只(33.3%)(P = 0.047)。F-DMEK组和M-DMEK组术后1年的细胞丢失率分别为26.8%和36.5%(P = 0.042),2年时分别为30.5%和42.3%(P = 0.008),3年时分别为37%和47.5%(P = 0.057)。F-DMEK组的移植物失败率为0%,M-DMEK组为8.9%(均为原发性失败;P = 0.565)。

结论

与M-DMEK相比,F-DMEK显示出良好的疗效,其脱离、再气泡形成和细胞丢失率均降低。

相似文献

1
Three-Year Outcome Comparison Between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Manual Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.飞秒激光辅助与手动后弹力层内皮角膜移植术的三年疗效比较
Cornea. 2019 Jul;38(7):812-816. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001956.
2
Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Descemetorhexis and Manual Descemetorhexis in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.飞秒激光辅助后弹力层撕除与手动后弹力层撕除在Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术中的比较
Cornea. 2017 Jul;36(7):767-770. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001217.
3
Comparison of Manual and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty.比较手动与飞秒激光辅助撕囊术在穿透性角膜移植失败后的应用。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;214:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
4
The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.标准化 Descemet 撕囊自动化角膜内皮移植术与标准化 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术的前 100 只眼。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Nov;122(11):2193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
5
Five-Year Safety and Efficacy of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.飞秒激光辅助的 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术的 5 年安全性和有效性。
Cornea. 2023 Feb 1;42(2):145-149. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003019. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
6
Descemetorhexis Without Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus DMEK for Treatment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.不进行内皮角膜移植的后弹力层撕除术与角膜后弹力层内皮移植术治疗Fuchs内皮角膜营养不良的对比
Cornea. 2018 Dec;37(12):1479-1483. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001742.
7
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Penetrating Keratoplasty: Features for Success.穿透性角膜移植术后的后弹力层内皮角膜移植术:成功的特征
Cornea. 2018 Sep;37(9):1093-1097. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001628.
8
DMEK versus DSAEK for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy: A meta-analysis.用于治疗富克斯内皮营养不良的 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术与深板层角膜内皮移植术的荟萃分析。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;29(1):15-22. doi: 10.1177/1120672118757431. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
Visual Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty-Comparison of Specific Matched Pairs.Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术与 Descemet 剥脱性自动内皮角膜移植术后的视觉效果——特定匹配对的比较
Cornea. 2016 Jun;35(6):765-71. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000822.
10
Outcomes of Hemi-Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.半厚后弹力层内皮角膜移植术治疗富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良的疗效
Cornea. 2018 Jul;37(7):854-858. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001578.

引用本文的文献

1
Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal transplantation.飞秒激光辅助角膜移植术
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep 8;13(3):274-284. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00080. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
2
Femtosecond laser applications in corneal surgery.飞秒激光在角膜手术中的应用。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep 8;13(3):293-305. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00083. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
3
Advantages of femtosecond laser in various corneal transplantation procedures: A narrative literature review.飞秒激光在各种角膜移植手术中的优势:一篇叙述性文献综述。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 4;13(3):265-273. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00067. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty without Routine Prophylactic Peripheral Iridotomy.不进行常规预防性周边虹膜切开术的Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术的临床结果
Vision (Basel). 2023 May 19;7(2):41. doi: 10.3390/vision7020041.
5
Outcomes of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty performed in combination with, before, or after cataract surgery in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy: A review of the literature and meta-analysis.联合白内障手术、白内障手术前或白内障手术后行 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术治疗 Fuchs 角膜内皮营养不良的结局:文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;71(3):707-716. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1245_22.
6
Fuchs Dystrophy and Cataract: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment.富克斯角膜内皮营养不良与白内障:诊断、评估及治疗
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):691-704. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00637-1. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Ophthalmic Surgery: From Laser Fundamentals to Clinical Applications.飞秒激光辅助眼科手术:从激光基础到临床应用
Micromachines (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;13(10):1653. doi: 10.3390/mi13101653.
8
Graft failure rate and complications after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.预先存在青光眼的眼睛行去内皮角膜内皮移植术后移植物失败率和并发症。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;261(2):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05813-4. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
9
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Update on preoperative considerations, surgical techniques, and outcomes.Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术:术前考虑因素、手术技术和结果的更新。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep;70(9):3222-3238. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2933_21.
10
Femtosecond-Laser Assisted Surgery of the Eye: Overview and Impact of the Low-Energy Concept.飞秒激光辅助眼科手术:低能量概念的概述与影响
Micromachines (Basel). 2021 Jan 24;12(2):122. doi: 10.3390/mi12020122.