Goodman Avi D, Walsh Devin F, Zonfrillo Mark R, Eberson Craig P, Cruz Aristides I
Department of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.
Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University Emergency Medicine Foundation, Providence, RI.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Jan;40(1):e14-e18. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001388.
Recent studies indicate that formal postreduction radiographs may be unnecessary for closed, isolated pediatric wrist, and forearm when mini C-arm fluoroscopy is used for reduction. Our institution changed the Emergency Department (ED) management protocol to reflect this by allowing orthopaedic providers to determine if fluoroscopy was acceptable to assess fracture reduction. We hypothesized that using fluoroscopy as definitive postreduction imaging would decrease total encounter time, without an increase in the rate of rereduction or surgery.
Patients with closed, isolated distal radius/distal ulna (DR/DU) or both bone forearm (BBFA) fractures that required sedation and reduction under mini C-arm fluoroscopy at our Level 1 pediatric ED were reviewed for 6 months both before and after this policy change. Before, all patients had formal postreduction radiographs; after, the decision was left to the orthopaedic physician. Timestamp data were collected, as was the need for rereduction or surgery. In addition to descriptive statistics, between-group differences were analyzed with the Student t test, χ test, and multivariable regression as appropriate.
A total of 243 patients (119 before, 124 after) had 165 DR/DU and 78 BBFA fractures. Demographic data were similar before and after. After protocol implementation, univariable analysis (Student t test) showed that sedation times were longer, while total ED time and the time from sedation beginning to discharge were similar. The proportion of patients requiring rereduction or surgery were similar.After multivariable regression, "fluoroscopy as definitive imaging" was the only independent determinant of the time intervals compared with using conventional radiography. Sedation was an average of 13.8 minutes longer (P<0.001), while the interval from sedation beginning to discharge was 15.8 minutes shorter (P=0.007), and total ED time was 33.0 minutes shorter (P=0.018). Fluoroscopy as definitive imaging was not a predictor of surgery (odds ratio=0.63, P=0.520), although having a BBFA increased the likelihood (odds ratio=4.50, P=0.008).
Implementing a protocol in which the provider could use mini C-arm fluoroscopy for definitive postreduction imaging did not result in increased rates remanipulation or need for surgery. Regression analysis further demonstrated time savings associated with foregoing conventional radiographs.
Level III-therapeutic.
最近的研究表明,当使用迷你C型臂荧光透视进行复位时,对于闭合性、孤立性小儿手腕和前臂骨折,复位后进行正式的X线片检查可能没有必要。我们机构改变了急诊科(ED)的管理方案,允许骨科医生决定荧光透视是否适合用于评估骨折复位情况,以体现这一点。我们假设,使用荧光透视作为复位后的确定性成像将减少总就诊时间,且不会增加再次复位或手术的发生率。
对我们一级儿科急诊科中因闭合性、孤立性桡骨远端/尺骨远端(DR/DU)或双骨前臂(BBFA)骨折而需要在迷你C型臂荧光透视下镇静和复位的患者,在这一政策改变前后各进行了6个月的回顾。之前,所有患者都进行了复位后的正式X线片检查;之后,则由骨科医生做出决定。收集了时间戳数据以及再次复位或手术的需求。除描述性统计外,还根据情况使用学生t检验、χ检验和多变量回归分析了组间差异。
共有243例患者(之前119例,之后124例)发生了165例DR/DU骨折和78例BBFA骨折。前后的人口统计学数据相似。方案实施后,单变量分析(学生t检验)显示镇静时间更长,而急诊总时间以及从开始镇静到出院的时间相似。需要再次复位或手术的患者比例相似。多变量回归分析后,与使用传统X线片相比,“荧光透视作为确定性成像”是各时间间隔的唯一独立决定因素。镇静时间平均延长了13.8分钟(P<0.001),而从开始镇静到出院的间隔缩短了15.8分钟(P=0.007),急诊总时间缩短了33.0分钟(P=0.018)。荧光透视作为确定性成像不是手术的预测因素(比值比=0.63,P=0.520),尽管发生BBFA会增加手术可能性(比值比=4.50,P=0.008)。
实施一项允许医生使用迷你C型臂荧光透视进行复位后确定性成像的方案,并未导致再次操作率或手术需求增加。回归分析进一步证明了省去传统X线片检查可节省时间。
三级治疗性。