Medical Genome Facility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 11;14(4):e0211400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211400. eCollection 2019.
Archival tissues represent a rich resource for clinical genomic studies, particularly when coupled with comprehensive medical records. Use of these in next generation sequencing (NGS) is a priority. Nine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) DNA extraction methods were evaluated using twelve FFPE samples of varying tissue types. Quality assessment included total yield, percent dsDNA, fragment analysis and multiplex PCR. After assessment, three tissue types from four FFPE DNA methods were selected for NGS downstream evaluation, targeted and whole exome sequencing. In addition, two low input library protocols were evaluated for WES. Analysis revealed average coverage across the target regions for WES was ~20-30X for all four FFPE DNA extraction methods. For the targeted panels, the highest molecular tag coverage was obtained with the Kingfisher FFPE extraction method. The genotype concordance was 99% for the commonly called variant positions between all four extraction methods with the targeted PCR NGS panel and 96% with WES. Assessing quality of extracted DNA aids in selecting the optimal NGS approach, and the choice of both DNA extraction and library preparation approaches can impact the performance of archival tissue in NGS.
存档组织代表着临床基因组研究的丰富资源,特别是与全面的医疗记录相结合时。下一代测序(NGS)的使用是当务之急。使用十二种不同组织类型的 FFPE 样本评估了九种福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)DNA 提取方法。质量评估包括总产量、双链 DNA(dsDNA)百分比、片段分析和多重 PCR。评估后,从四种 FFPE DNA 方法中的三种组织类型中选择用于 NGS 下游评估的靶向和全外显子组测序。此外,还评估了两种低输入文库方案用于 WES。分析显示,对于所有四种 FFPE DNA 提取方法,WES 目标区域的平均覆盖度约为 20-30X。对于靶向面板,Kingfisher FFPE 提取方法获得了最高的分子标记物覆盖率。在靶向 PCR NGS 面板上,所有四种提取方法之间常见的变异位置的基因型一致性为 99%,而在 WES 上为 96%。评估提取 DNA 的质量有助于选择最佳的 NGS 方法,并且 DNA 提取和文库制备方法的选择都会影响 NGS 中存档组织的性能。