Suppr超能文献

评估福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织用于全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的适用性。

Assessing the suitability of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue for genome-wide association studies (GWAS).

作者信息

Reingruber Julian, Krämer Maximilian J, Bigge Jessica, Dasmeh Pouria, Grover Sandeep, Heilmann-Heimbach Stefanie, Nöthen Markus M, Kreuser Nicole, Gockel Ines, Veits Lothar, Vieth Michael, Jank Paul, Denkert Carsten, Maj Carlo, Hess Timo, Schumacher Johannes

机构信息

Center for Human Genetics, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Mildred Scheel Early Career Centre (MSNZ) for Cancer Research Würzburg, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jul 1;18(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07306-z.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify common disease variants depends primarily on the number of included samples. The availability of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples in pathology institutes provides a valuable resource for GWAS, but the use of this material poses significant challenges. To explore the suitability of utilizing FFPE tissue for GWAS, we analysed the genotyping concordance between corresponding FFPE and blood samples. We evaluated both microarray technology and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (lcWGS) to determine whether there were differences between genotyping methods.

RESULTS

In our concordance study, FFPE tissue showed high recall and precision values across both genotyping methods when compared to matched blood samples for single nucleotide polymorphisms. This demonstrates that FFPE samples are suitable for GWAS and that both methods are viable options for genotyping. However, microarray technology outperformed lcWGS, as evidenced by significantly higher recall ( = 0.005) and precision ( = 0.003) values. This, together with the lower cost of genotyping and computational efficiency, makes microarray technology currently the superior method for GWAS using FFPE tissue. Nevertheless, lcWGS has shown reliable results and holds the potential to provide more comprehensive and unbiased genetic variant analysis across diverse populations in the future. Our results show that the large number of FFPE samples stored in pathology institutes can significantly increase the power of future GWAS.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-025-07306-z.

摘要

目的

全基因组关联研究(GWAS)识别常见疾病变异的能力主要取决于纳入样本的数量。病理机构中福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)样本的可用性为GWAS提供了宝贵资源,但使用这种材料带来了重大挑战。为了探索利用FFPE组织进行GWAS的适用性,我们分析了相应FFPE样本与血液样本之间的基因分型一致性。我们评估了微阵列技术和低覆盖度全基因组测序(lcWGS),以确定基因分型方法之间是否存在差异。

结果

在我们的一致性研究中,与匹配的血液样本相比,FFPE组织在两种基因分型方法中对单核苷酸多态性均显示出高召回率和精确率值。这表明FFPE样本适用于GWAS,且两种方法都是可行的基因分型选择。然而,微阵列技术表现优于lcWGS,召回率( = 0.005)和精确率( = 0.003)值显著更高证明了这一点。这一点,再加上较低的基因分型成本和计算效率,使得微阵列技术目前成为使用FFPE组织进行GWAS的更优方法。尽管如此,lcWGS已显示出可靠的结果,并且未来有潜力在不同人群中提供更全面、无偏差的基因变异分析。我们的结果表明,病理机构中储存的大量FFPE样本可以显著提高未来GWAS的效力。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s13104-025-07306-z获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d971/12211376/d060c1aec55b/13104_2025_7306_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验