Suppr超能文献

德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素300单位/毫升相比在有胰岛素治疗经验的2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:试验方案修正案(NCT03078478)

Efficacy and Safety of Degludec Compared to Glargine 300 Units/mL in Insulin-Experienced Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Trial Protocol Amendment (NCT03078478).

作者信息

Philis-Tsimikas Athena, Stratton Irene, Nørgård Troelsen Lone, Anker Bak Britta, Leiter Lawrence A

机构信息

1 Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.

2 Gloucestershire Retinal Research Group, Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, UK.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):498-506. doi: 10.1177/1932296819841585. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A head-to-head trial (NCT03078478) between insulin degludec and insulin glargine U300 with the primary objective of comparing the risk of hypoglycemia is being conducted. During trial conduct, safety concerns related to the glycemic data collection system led to a postinitiation protocol amendment, described here.

METHODS

This randomized (1:1), open-label, treat-to-target, multinational trial was initiated in March 2017 with a planned treatment period of 52 weeks (16 weeks titration + 36 weeks maintenance). Overall, ~1600 insulin-experienced patients at risk of developing hypoglycemia based on predefined risk factors were included. The protocol amendment implemented in February 2018 resulted in assuring patient safety and an extension of the total treatment period up to 88 weeks (16 weeks titration + variable maintenance 1 + 36 weeks maintenance 2). The original glycemic data collection system (MyGlucoHealth blood glucose meter + electronic diary) was discontinued because of safety concerns and replaced with an Abbott blood glucose meter and paper diary to collect self-measured blood glucose and hypoglycemic episodes. The primary endpoint of number of severe or blood-glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycemic episodes will be evaluated with the same analysis duration and statistical methods as the original protocol. Only relevant changes were implemented to maintain patient safety while permitting evaluation of the scientific objectives of the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations highlight the importance of safety surveillance during trial conduct despite the use of currently marketed glucose monitoring devices. The prompt protocol amendment and ensuing actions ensured that the scientific integrity of the trial was not compromised.

摘要

背景

正在进行一项德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素U300的头对头试验(NCT03078478),其主要目的是比较低血糖风险。在试验进行期间,与血糖数据收集系统相关的安全问题导致了启动后方案修订,在此进行描述。

方法

这项随机(1:1)、开放标签、达标治疗的多国试验于2017年3月启动,计划治疗期为52周(16周滴定期 + 36周维持期)。总体而言,纳入了约1600名根据预定义风险因素有发生低血糖风险的有胰岛素治疗经验的患者。2018年2月实施的方案修订确保了患者安全,并将总治疗期延长至88周(16周滴定期 + 可变维持期1 + 36周维持期2)。由于安全问题,原血糖数据收集系统(MyGlucoHealth血糖仪 + 电子日记)停用,取而代之的是雅培血糖仪和纸质日记,用于收集自我测量的血糖和低血糖事件。严重或血糖确认的有症状低血糖事件数的主要终点将采用与原方案相同的分析持续时间和统计方法进行评估。仅实施了相关变更以维持患者安全,同时允许对试验的科学目标进行评估。

结论

这些观察结果凸显了在试验进行期间进行安全监测的重要性,尽管使用了当前市售的血糖监测设备。迅速的方案修订及后续行动确保了试验的科学完整性未受损害。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
How conclusive is the CONCLUDE trial?CONCLUDE 试验的结论性如何?
Diabetologia. 2020 Apr;63(4):692-697. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05086-8. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

本文引用的文献

4
Investigation of the Accuracy of 18 Marketed Blood Glucose Monitors.18 种市售血糖仪准确性的调查。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1681-1688. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1960. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验