• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国腹膜透析与血液透析临床结局的比较研究:基于人群的方法。

Comparative study of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis on the clinical outcomes in Korea: a population-based approach.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, , Internal Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical center, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea.

National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 11;9(1):5905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42508-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-42508-z
PMID:30976069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6459886/
Abstract

There has been paucity of data regarding the secular trend of adverse outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD) as compared with hemodialysis (HD) in Korea. 96,596 patients who started dialysis between 2004-2015 in Korea were identified using the National Health Insurance Service database. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval, CI) of PD over HD for mortality was 1.31 (1.27-1.36; P < 0.001) in the period of 2004-2007 and 1.21 (1.16-1.27; P < 0.001) in the period of 2008-2011. However, the hazard of PD over HD for mortality turned out to be insignificant in the period of 2012-2015. Similar trend was noted for nonfatal cardiovascular events (CVEs). In subgroup analysis, the hazard of PD over HD for mortality was evident, regardless of the status of age, diabetes, and comorbidity burden in 2004-2011. In 2012-2015, however, the hazard of PD over HD for mortality was insignificant when follow up was censored at one year, which became significant when follow up follow up was censored at three or five year. In conclusion, the mortality of PD over HD in Korea has been significantly improved, a finding that was paralleled by the improved nonfatal CVEs.

摘要

与血液透析(HD)相比,韩国腹膜透析(PD)不良结局的长期趋势数据较少。使用国家健康保险服务数据库,确定了 2004-2015 年期间在韩国开始透析的 96596 名患者。在 2004-2007 年期间,PD 相对于 HD 的死亡率调整后的危险比(HR)(95%置信区间,CI)为 1.31(1.27-1.36;P < 0.001),在 2008-2011 年期间为 1.21(1.16-1.27;P < 0.001)。然而,2012-2015 年期间,PD 相对于 HD 的死亡率风险并不显著。非致命性心血管事件(CVE)也出现了类似的趋势。在亚组分析中,2004-2011 年期间,无论年龄、糖尿病和合并症负担状况如何,PD 相对于 HD 的死亡率风险均明显升高。然而,2012-2015 年期间,当随访截止为一年时,PD 相对于 HD 的死亡率风险不显著,当随访截止为三年或五年时,该风险变得显著。总之,韩国 PD 相对于 HD 的死亡率得到了显著改善,这一发现与非致命性 CVE 的改善相吻合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f4/6459886/0efeef35bb7d/41598_2019_42508_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f4/6459886/d07bb2da5b7b/41598_2019_42508_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f4/6459886/796ceb5ac9d8/41598_2019_42508_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f4/6459886/0efeef35bb7d/41598_2019_42508_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f4/6459886/d07bb2da5b7b/41598_2019_42508_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f4/6459886/796ceb5ac9d8/41598_2019_42508_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f4/6459886/0efeef35bb7d/41598_2019_42508_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative study of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis on the clinical outcomes in Korea: a population-based approach.韩国腹膜透析与血液透析临床结局的比较研究:基于人群的方法。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 11;9(1):5905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42508-z.
2
Dialysis Modality and Mortality in the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis.老年患者的透析方式与死亡率:一项荟萃分析
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):983-93. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05160514. Epub 2015 May 4.
3
A comparative assessment of survival between propensity score-matched patients with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in Taiwan.台湾地区倾向评分匹配的腹膜透析患者与血液透析患者生存率的比较评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2012 May;91(3):144-151. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e318256538e.
4
Risk of major cardiovascular events among incident dialysis patients: A Korean national population-based study.新透析患者主要心血管事件的风险:一项基于韩国全国人口的研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;198:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.120. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
A population-based approach indicates an overall higher patient mortality with peritoneal dialysis compared to hemodialysis in Korea.一项基于人群的研究表明,与血液透析相比,韩国腹膜透析患者的总体死亡率更高。
Kidney Int. 2014 Nov;86(5):991-1000. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.163. Epub 2014 May 7.
6
Comparison of Subdural Hematoma Risk between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with ESRD.终末期肾病血液透析与腹膜透析患者硬膜下血肿风险的比较。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):994-1001. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08140814. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
7
Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: a comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia.哥伦比亚透析结果(DOC)研究:哥伦比亚腹膜透析与血液透析患者生存率比较
Kidney Int Suppl. 2008 Apr(108):S165-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002619.
8
Long-term modality-related mortality analysis in incident dialysis patients.新发透析患者的长期透析方式相关死亡率分析
Perit Dial Int. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):182-90.
9
Comparison of survival between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease in the era of icodextrin treatment.对比使用艾考糊精治疗时代下,终末期肾病行血液透析和腹膜透析患者的生存情况。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Apr;50:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
Comparable outcome of acute unplanned peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis.急性非计划性腹膜透析与血液透析的可比结局。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jan;27(1):375-80. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr262. Epub 2011 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Current position of Moncrief and Popovich's technique in patients on peritoneal dialysis: who really benefits from this technique from the perspective of mortality and peritonitis development?蒙克里夫和波波维奇技术在腹膜透析患者中的当前地位:从死亡率和腹膜炎发生的角度来看,谁真正从这项技术中获益?
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s10157-025-02730-8.
2
Selection of dialysis methods for end-stage kidney disease patients with diabetes.终末期糖尿病肾病患者透析方式的选择
World J Diabetes. 2024 Sep 15;15(9):1862-1873. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i9.1862.
3
Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The pattern of choosing dialysis modality and related mortality outcomes in Korea: a national population-based study.韩国透析方式的选择模式及相关死亡结局:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(4):699-710. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.141. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
2
A prime determinant in selecting dialysis modality: peritoneal dialysis patient survival.选择透析方式的一个主要决定因素:腹膜透析患者的生存率。
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2017 Mar;36(1):22-28. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.2017.36.1.22. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
3
Economic burden of chronic kidney disease in Korea using national sample cohort.
腹膜透析与血液透析治疗开始透析的患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD013800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013800.pub2.
4
Immediate-start peritoneal dialysis without break-in-period: an 18-year retrospective cohort study on patient survival.无导入期的即刻开始腹膜透析:一项关于患者生存情况的18年回顾性队列研究
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;44(2):338-348. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.103. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
5
Mortality of Peritoneal Dialysis versus Hemodialysis in Older Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年腹膜透析与血液透析患者死亡率的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gerontology. 2024;70(5):461-478. doi: 10.1159/000536648. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Kidney Health Plan 2033 in Korea: bridging the gap between the present and the future.韩国《2033年肾脏健康计划》:弥合当前与未来的差距。
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jan;43(1):8-19. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.232. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
7
Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in Bahrain.巴林血液透析与腹膜透析患者的生活质量
Cureus. 2023 Nov 25;15(11):e49408. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49408. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Multi-center, pragmatic, cluster-randomized, controlled trial of standardized peritoneal dialysis (PD) training versus usual care on PD-related infections (the TEACH-PD trial): trial protocol.多中心、实用、整群随机对照试验,比较标准化腹膜透析(PD)培训与常规护理对 PD 相关感染的影响(TEACH-PD 试验):试验方案。
Trials. 2023 Nov 14;24(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07715-0.
9
Comparison of the effect of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.血液透析与腹膜透析治疗终末期肾病的效果比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Nov-Dec;39(6):1562-1567. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.8056.
10
Clinical impact of catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis on patient survival and catheter-related complications.经皮穿刺置管行腹膜透析对患者生存及导管相关并发症的临床影响。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2023 Nov;27(11):941-950. doi: 10.1007/s10157-023-02382-6. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
韩国利用国家抽样队列研究慢性肾脏病的经济负担。
J Nephrol. 2017 Dec;30(6):787-793. doi: 10.1007/s40620-017-0380-3. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
4
Improved trends in cardiovascular complications among subjects with type 2 diabetes in Korea: a nationwide study (2006-2013).韩国2型糖尿病患者心血管并发症的改善趋势:一项全国性研究(2006 - 2013年)
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Jan 6;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0482-6.
5
Data Resource Profile: The National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea.数据资源简介:韩国国民健康保险服务的国家健康信息数据库
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):799-800. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw253.
6
Outcomes of Kidney Recipients According to Mode of Pretransplantation Renal Replacement Therapy.根据移植前肾脏替代治疗方式的肾脏受者结局
Transplant Proc. 2016 Sep;48(7):2461-2463. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.02.096.
7
Quality of Life and Physical Function in Older Patients on Dialysis: A Comparison of Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis with Hemodialysis.老年透析患者的生活质量与身体功能:辅助性腹膜透析与血液透析的比较
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):423-30. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01050115. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
8
Lessons from 30 years' data of Korean end-stage renal disease registry, 1985-2015.韩国终末期肾病登记处30年数据(1985 - 2015年)的经验教训。
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2015 Sep;34(3):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.krcp.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
9
Improving survival rate of Korean patients initiating dialysis.提高开始透析的韩国患者的生存率。
Yonsei Med J. 2015 May;56(3):666-75. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.666.
10
Major changes and improvements of dialysis therapy in Korea: review of end-stage renal disease registry.韩国透析治疗的重大变化与改进:终末期肾病登记回顾
Korean J Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):17-22. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.1.17. Epub 2014 Dec 30.