Yasir Safaa F, Jani Janmaizatulriah, Mukri Mazidah
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Technology Mara, UiTM, Shah Alam, 40450, Malaysia.
Data Brief. 2019 Mar 21;24:103821. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103821. eCollection 2019 Jun.
This data illustration the similarity and accuracy of two subsurface profile analysis software which is RES2DINV and VOXLER. Electrical resistivity imaging methods was conducted as a geophysical technique to get subsurface profile were borehole had previously been made in the same locations. The General Department of Geoscience (JMG) conducted the drilling of the borehole in three locations which is Kampung Bangkahulu, Gemas, Kampung Semerbok, Rembau and Felda Bukit Rokan Utara. The 2D resistivity image from RES2DINV and the 3D image from VOXLER was highly matching the subsurface profile compared with borehole data log. The depth of the resistivity was 76.8, 87.2 and 39.4 respectively for the sites. This two software gave more clearly interpreted result for investigate the sub ground and geological formations.
这些数据说明了两种地下剖面分析软件RES2DINV和VOXLER的相似性和准确性。电阻率成像方法作为一种地球物理技术，用于获取先前在相同位置进行过钻孔的地下剖面。地球科学总局（JMG）在三个地点进行了钻孔，分别是甘榜邦卡胡卢、瓜拉庇劳、甘榜塞默博克、林茂和北武吉罗丹联邦土地发展局。与钻孔数据日志相比，RES2DINV的二维电阻率图像和VOXLER的三维图像与地下剖面高度匹配。这些地点的电阻率深度分别为76.8、87.2和39.4。这两种软件为研究地下和地质构造提供了更清晰的解释结果。
