A.I.S.E. (International Association for Soaps, Detergents and Maintenance Products), Belgium.
Boeije Consulting bvba, Belgium.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Jul;105:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
The use of lower cut-off values/concentration limits for the calculation of mixture classification in UN GHS/EU CLP versus the previous regulatory scheme (EU Dangerous Preparations Directive, DPD), has resulted in an increased number of classifications in the highest eye hazard category. Herein, a semi-quantitative categorisation of severity of eye effects, following accidental human exposures to detergents, was compared to the classification category of the products. Three schemes were evaluated: EU DPD; EU CLP (based on all available data and information, including weight of evidence); and EU CLP (based entirely on the calculation method). As reported by four EU Poison Centres, the vast majority of exposures had caused minor or no symptoms. Classification was a poor predictor of effects in man subjected to accidental exposure. Note however that this is also because effects are not only driven by the intrinsic hazard (as reflected in the classification), but also by the exposure conditions and mitigation (i.e. rinsing). EU CLP classification using all available data and information was more predictive of medically relevant symptoms than the EU CLP calculation method. The latter led to a poorer differentiation between irritating products versus products potentially causing serious eye damage.
在 UN GHS/EU CLP 中,与之前的监管方案(欧盟危险制剂指令,DPD)相比,使用更低的截止值/浓度限值来计算混合物分类,导致最高眼危害类别中的分类数量增加。在此,本文比较了意外接触清洁剂的人类眼部影响的严重程度的半定量分类与产品的分类类别。评估了三种方案:欧盟 DPD;欧盟 CLP(基于所有可用数据和信息,包括证据权重);和欧盟 CLP(完全基于计算方法)。据四个欧盟中毒中心报告,绝大多数接触仅导致轻微或无症状。分类对于意外接触的人来说,是对其影响的一个较差的预测因素。请注意,这也是因为影响不仅取决于内在危害(如分类所反映的),还取决于暴露条件和缓解(即冲洗)。使用所有可用数据和信息的欧盟 CLP 分类比欧盟 CLP 计算方法更能预测与医学相关的症状。后者导致对刺激性产品与可能导致严重眼部损伤的产品之间的区分较差。