Cavalcanti Daniel Dutra, Morais Bárbara Albuquerque, Figueiredo Eberval Gadelha, Spetzler Robert F, Preul Mark C
2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
1Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona; and.
J Neurosurg. 2019 Apr 12;132(5):1653-1658. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.JNS182036. Print 2020 May 1.
The brainstem is a compact, delicate structure. The surgeon must have good anatomical knowledge of the safe entry points to safely resect intrinsic lesions. Lesions located at the lateral midbrain surface are better approached through the lateral mesencephalic sulcus (LMS). The goal of this study was to compare the surgical exposure to the LMS provided by the subtemporal (ST) approach and the paramedian and extreme-lateral variants of the supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approach.
These 3 approaches were used in 10 cadaveric heads. The authors performed measurements of predetermined points by using a neuronavigation system. Areas of microsurgical exposure and angles of the approaches were determined. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in the respective exposures.
The surgical exposure was similar for the different approaches-369.8 ± 70.1 mm2 for the ST; 341.2 ± 71.2 mm2 for the SCIT paramedian variant; and 312.0 ± 79.3 mm2 for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant (p = 0.13). However, the vertical angular exposure was 16.3° ± 3.6° for the ST, 19.4° ± 3.4° for the SCIT paramedian variant, and 25.1° ± 3.3° for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant craniotomy (p < 0.001). The horizontal angular exposure was 45.2° ± 6.3° for the ST, 35.6° ± 2.9° for the SCIT paramedian variant, and 45.5° ± 6.6° for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant opening, presenting no difference between the ST and extreme-lateral variant (p = 0.92), but both were superior to the paramedian variant (p < 0.001). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
The extreme-lateral SCIT approach had the smaller area of surgical exposure; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The extreme-lateral SCIT approach presented a wider vertical and horizontal angle to the LMS compared to the other craniotomies. Also, it provides a 90° trajectory to the sulcus that facilitates the intraoperative microsurgical technique.
脑干是一个紧凑、精细的结构。外科医生必须对安全切除脑干内部病变的安全入路有良好的解剖学知识。位于中脑外侧表面的病变通过外侧中脑沟(LMS)进行手术更为合适。本研究的目的是比较颞下(ST)入路与小脑上幕下(SCIT)入路的旁正中及极外侧变体对LMS的手术显露情况。
在10个尸体头颅上使用这3种入路。作者使用神经导航系统对预定点进行测量。确定显微手术显露区域和入路角度。进行统计分析以确定各显露情况的显著差异。
不同入路的手术显露情况相似——ST入路为369.8±70.1mm²;SCIT旁正中变体为341.2±71.2mm²;SCIT极外侧变体为312.0±79.3mm²(p = 0.13)。然而,垂直角度显露方面,ST入路为16.3°±3.6°,SCIT旁正中变体为19.4°±3.4°,SCIT极外侧开颅变体为25.1°±3.3°(p < 0.001)。水平角度显露方面,ST入路为45.2°±6.3°,SCIT旁正中变体为35.6°±2.9°,SCIT极外侧开口为45.5°±6.6°,ST与极外侧变体之间无差异(p = 0.92),但两者均优于旁正中变体(p < 0.001)。数据以平均值±标准差表示。
极外侧SCIT入路的手术显露面积较小;然而,这些差异无统计学意义。与其他开颅手术相比,极外侧SCIT入路对LMS的垂直和水平角度更宽。此外,它为脑沟提供了90°的轨迹,便于术中显微手术操作。