Suppr超能文献

使用溶血磷脂酸作为卵巢癌生物标志物的挑战与不一致性

Challenges and Inconsistencies in Using Lysophosphatidic Acid as a Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer.

作者信息

Yagi Tsukasa, Shoaib Muhammad, Kuschner Cyrus, Nishikimi Mitsuaki, Becker Lance B, Lee Annette T, Kim Junhwan

机构信息

Center for Immunology and Inflammation, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, 350 Community Dr., Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.

Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 500 Hofstra Blvd, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2019 Apr 11;11(4):520. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040520.

Abstract

Increased detection of plasma lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) has been proposed as a potential diagnostic biomarker in ovarian cancer, but inconsistency exists in these reports. It has been shown that LPA can undergo an artificial increase during sample processing and analysis, which has not been accounted for in ovarian cancer research. The aim of this study is to provide a potential explanation about how the artificial increase in LPA may have interfered with previous LPA analysis in ovarian cancer research. Using an established LC-MS method, we measured LPA and other lysophospholipid levels in plasma obtained from three cohorts of patients: non-cancer controls, patients with benign ovarian tumors, and those with ovarian cancer. We did not find the LPA level to be higher in cancer samples. To understand this inconsistency, we observed that LPA content changed more significantly than other lysophospholipids as a function of plasma storage time while frozen. Additionally, only LPA was found to be adversely impacted by incubation time depending on the Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) concentration used during blood drawing. We also show that the inhibition of autotaxin effectively prevented artificial LPA generation during incubation at room temperature. Our data suggests that the artificial changes in LPA content may contribute to the discrepancies reported in literature. Any future studies planning to measure plasma LPA should carefully design the study protocol to consider these confounding factors.

摘要

血浆溶血磷脂酸(LPA)检测增加已被提议作为卵巢癌的一种潜在诊断生物标志物,但这些报告存在不一致性。研究表明,LPA在样本处理和分析过程中可能会人为增加,而这在卵巢癌研究中并未得到考虑。本研究的目的是对LPA的人为增加如何干扰卵巢癌研究中先前的LPA分析提供一个潜在解释。我们使用一种既定的液相色谱-质谱方法,测量了来自三组患者血浆中的LPA和其他溶血磷脂水平:非癌症对照、良性卵巢肿瘤患者和卵巢癌患者。我们未发现癌症样本中的LPA水平更高。为了解这种不一致性,我们观察到,在冷冻状态下,LPA含量随血浆储存时间的变化比其他溶血磷脂更为显著。此外,仅LPA被发现会受到孵育时间的不利影响,这取决于采血过程中使用的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)浓度。我们还表明,抑制自分泌运动因子可有效防止室温孵育期间人为生成LPA。我们的数据表明,LPA含量的人为变化可能导致了文献报道中的差异。未来任何计划测量血浆LPA的研究都应仔细设计研究方案以考虑这些混杂因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a0/6521627/b8b2b7354621/cancers-11-00520-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验