Suppr超能文献

陀思妥耶夫斯基和马查多·德·阿西斯作品中的癫痫体验。

The epileptic experience in the works of Dostoyevsky and Machado de Assis.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil; Danish Epilepsy Centre Filadelfia, Dianalund, Denmark.

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Aug;121(Pt B):106205. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Abstract

Towards the end of the 19th century, two writers who are considered the uppermost representatives of their respective national literatures, Dostoyevsky of Russia and Machado de Assis of Brazil had epilepsy, probably both temporal lobe epilepsy, but their attitudes were opposite. Dostoyevsky was as open about his diagnosis as Machado was secretive, but both included seizure experiences in their works. Two of Dostoyevsky's many epileptic characters, Prince Myshkin in The Idiot and Kirillov in Devils, report the same ecstatic aura as Dostoyevsky did privately. That Kirillov only has isolated auras probably reflects the early phase of Dostoyevsky's epilepsy. A hitherto overlooked feature, these reports with numerous reformulations and metaphors are linguistically characteristic for self-reports of epileptic auras, related to the indescribability of the experiences. In Idiot, two seizure prodromes with great artistic skill are integrated into the fictional context. Machado in his writings never talked overtly about seizures and epilepsy, but experiences of complex partial seizures can be identified in two of his novels, Brás Cubas and Quincas Borba. One depicts a complex visual illusion, the other seems precipitated by a coincidence of several ambivalent decisions with a specific memory. Quincas Borba (1891) has several features that can be understood as an homage to Dostoyevsky's Idiot (1869). Both writers share the notion that seizures can be triggered by strong emotions, and both stand out by their mastership of seamlessly integrating seizure experiences into the fictional and psychological cosmos of their novels. This article is part of the Special Issue "NEWroscience 2018".

摘要

19 世纪末,两位被认为是各自国家文学最高代表的作家,俄罗斯的陀思妥耶夫斯基和巴西的马查多·德·阿西斯,都患有癫痫症,可能都是颞叶癫痫,但他们的态度却截然相反。陀思妥耶夫斯基像马查多一样对自己的诊断守口如瓶,但两人都在作品中描述了癫痫发作的经历。陀思妥耶夫斯基众多癫痫症患者中有两位,白痴中的梅什金公爵和恶魔中的基里洛夫,报告了与陀思妥耶夫斯基本人私下里相同的狂喜氛围。基里洛夫只有孤立的光环,可能反映了陀思妥耶夫斯基癫痫的早期阶段。这些报告经过多次改写和隐喻,是迄今为止被忽视的特征,在语言学上是癫痫发作的自我报告的特征,与经历的难以形容有关。在白痴中,两个具有极大艺术技巧的癫痫先兆被融入到虚构的背景中。马查多在他的作品中从未公开谈论过癫痫发作和癫痫,但可以在他的两部小说《布拉斯·库巴斯》和《金卡斯·博尔巴》中识别出复杂部分性癫痫发作的经历。其中一部描绘了一个复杂的视觉幻觉,另一部似乎是由几个矛盾决定与特定记忆的巧合引发的。《金卡斯·博尔巴》(1891 年)有几个特点,可以被理解为对陀思妥耶夫斯基的《白痴》(1869 年)的致敬。两位作家都认为癫痫发作可能是由强烈的情绪引发的,他们都以将癫痫发作的经历无缝地融入到他们小说的虚构和心理世界中而著称。本文是“NEWroscience 2018”特刊的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验