Coşkun İpek, Kaya Burçak
Orthodontist, Private Practice, İstanbul, Turkey.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Orofac Orthop. 2019 May;80(3):144-158. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00175-9. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
The goal of this work was to examine the relationship between sagittal facial pattern and thickness of alveolar bone in conjunction with root morphology of teeth by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
The study was carried out on the CBCT scans from 3 group of patients (n = 20 in each group). The first group involved skeletal class 1, the second group involved skeletal class 2, and the third group involved skeletal class 3 patients. In all, 14 permanent teeth and interdental regions in the maxilla and mandible were evaluated. Root length and root width were measured on each tooth. Buccal cortical bone thickness, cancellous bone thickness, and lingual cortical bone thicknesses were measured in each interdental region. Analysis of variance, Kruskall-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical comparisons.
No significant difference was found between the groups for root length, root width, buccal cortical bone and lingual cortical bone thickness. A significant difference was observed between the groups for cancellous bone thickness as it was thicker in skeletal class 2 group. Cortical bone was thicker in the mandible compared to maxilla on both buccal and lingual sides and it was thicker in the posterior region compared to the anterior region on the buccal side.
Differences in cancellous bone thickness between different sagittal facial patterns and differences in cortical bone thickness between different alveolar regions should be taken into consideration when planning orthodontic tooth movements and anchorage mechanics.
本研究旨在通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),探讨矢状面面部形态与牙槽骨厚度以及牙齿牙根形态之间的关系。
对3组患者(每组n = 20)的CBCT扫描图像进行研究。第一组为骨骼Ⅰ类患者,第二组为骨骼Ⅱ类患者,第三组为骨骼Ⅲ类患者。总共评估了上颌和下颌的14颗恒牙及牙间区域。测量每颗牙齿的牙根长度和牙根宽度。在每个牙间区域测量颊侧皮质骨厚度、松质骨厚度和舌侧皮质骨厚度。采用方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis H检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学比较。
各组之间在牙根长度、牙根宽度、颊侧皮质骨和舌侧皮质骨厚度方面未发现显著差异。在松质骨厚度方面,各组之间观察到显著差异,骨骼Ⅱ类组的松质骨更厚。在下颌,颊侧和舌侧的皮质骨均比上颌厚,且在颊侧,后部区域的皮质骨比前部区域厚。
在规划正畸牙齿移动和支抗力学时,应考虑不同矢状面面部形态之间松质骨厚度的差异以及不同牙槽区域之间皮质骨厚度的差异。