Comparison of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potentials Monitoring with Direct Cranial Stimulation by Peg-Screw and Transcranial Stimulation by Corkscrew for Supratentorial Surgery.

OBJECTIVE

Corkscrew (CS) electrodes are usually used for transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in the intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP). Direct cranial stimulation with peg-screw (PS) electrodes can elicit MEP. The present study investigated the difference in the initial threshold between PS and CS electrodes for intraoperative MEP monitoring.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed TES-MEP monitoring for supratentorial surgery in 72 patients. Of these 72 patients, 44 were monitored with PS and CS electrodes (PS/CS group) and 28 were monitored with CS and CS electrodes (CS/CS group). TES was used to deliver electrical stimulation by a train of 4-pulse anodal constant current stimulation. The initial threshold in each electrode was checked and analyzed.

RESULTS

In the PS/CS group, the initial threshold with the PS electrode was 38.3 ± 15.1 mA (mean ± standard deviation) on the affected side, and the initial threshold with the CS electrode was 51.4 ± 13.9 mA on the unaffected side. The initial threshold with the PS electrode was significantly lower than that with the CS electrode (P = 0.0001). In the CS/CS group, the initial threshold was 56.2 ± 16.5 mA on the affected side and 62.1 ± 18.6 mA on the unaffected side, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The initial threshold to elicit MEP was significantly lower with the PS electrode than with the CS electrode. A PS electrode can be used as a feasible stimulation electrode for TES-MEP.