1 Capri Cardiac Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Aug;33(8):1355-1366. doi: 10.1177/0269215519842216. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
In this secondary analysis of data from the OPTICARE trial, we compared the effects of two behavioral interventions integrated into cardiac rehabilitation to standard rehabilitation with regard to functional capacity, fatigue, and participation in society.
This is a randomized controlled trial.
This study was conducted in a cardiac rehabilitation setting.
A total of 740 patients with acute coronary syndrome were recruited for this study.
Patients were randomized to (1) three months of standard rehabilitation; (2) cardiac rehabilitation plus nine months after-care with face-to-face group lifestyle counseling; or (3) cardiac rehabilitation plus nine months after-care with individual lifestyle telephone counseling.
Functional capacity (6-minute walk test), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale), and participation in society (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation) were measured at randomization, 3, 12, and 18 months.
Additional face-to-face sessions resulted at 12 months in 12.49 m more on the 6-minute walk test compared to standard rehabilitation ( = .041). This difference was no longer present at 18 months. Prevalence of fatigue decreased from 30.2% at baseline to 11.9% at 18 months compared to an improvement from 37.3% to 24.9% after standard rehabilitation (between-group difference: odds ratio = 0.47; = .010). The additional improvements in functional capacity seemed to be mediated by increases in daily physical activity. No mediating effects were found for fatigue. No additional improvements were seen for participation in society. Additional telephonic sessions did not result in additional intervention effects.
Extending cardiac rehabilitation with a face-to-face behavioral intervention resulted in additional long-term improvements in fatigue and small improvements in functional capacity up to 12 months. A telephonic behavioral intervention provided no additional benefits.
在 OPTICARE 试验的数据的二次分析中,我们比较了两种行为干预措施整合到心脏康复中与标准康复相比对功能能力、疲劳和参与社会的影响。
这是一项随机对照试验。
本研究在心脏康复环境中进行。
共有 740 名急性冠状动脉综合征患者参加了这项研究。
患者被随机分为 (1) 三个月的标准康复;(2) 心脏康复加九个月的面对面小组生活方式咨询后的护理;或 (3) 心脏康复加九个月的个体生活方式电话咨询后的护理。
功能能力(6 分钟步行测试)、疲劳(疲劳严重程度量表)和参与社会(康复评估-参与度乌得勒支量表)在随机分组时、3 个月、12 个月和 18 个月时进行测量。
在 12 个月时,额外的面对面会议导致 6 分钟步行测试增加了 12.49 米,与标准康复相比(=.041)。这一差异在 18 个月时不再存在。与标准康复后从 37.3%降至 24.9%相比,疲劳的患病率从基线时的 30.2%下降到 18 个月时的 11.9%(组间差异:优势比=0.47;=.010)。功能能力的额外改善似乎是通过日常体力活动的增加来介导的。疲劳方面没有发现中介效应。在参与社会方面没有看到额外的改善。额外的电话会议没有产生额外的干预效果。
将面对面的行为干预措施扩展到心脏康复中,可在 12 个月内使疲劳得到额外的长期改善,并使功能能力得到微小的改善。电话行为干预没有带来额外的好处。