Iakovlev Ivan, Reznikova Zhanna
Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
V. Zelman Institute for Medicine and Psychology, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00710. eCollection 2019.
The adaptive benefits of individual specialization and how learning abilities correlate with task performance are still far from being well-understood. Red wood ants are characterized by their huge colonies and deep professional specialization. We hypothesized that red wood ants form aversive learning after having negative encounters with hoverfly larvae differently, depending on their task specialization. We tested this hypothesis, first, by examining whether hunters and aphid milkers learn differently to avoid the nuisance of contacts with syrphid larvae, and, second, by analyzing the difference between learning in "field" and laboratory-reared (naïve) foragers. During the first interaction with the syrphid larva in their lives the naïve foragers showed a significantly higher level of aggressiveness than the members of a natural colony. Naïve foragers applied the "mortal grip," "prolonged bites," and "nibbling" toward the enemy with a significantly higher frequency, whereas members of both "field" groups behaved more carefully and tried to avoid encounters with the larva. The aphid milkers, who had a negative experience of interaction with the larva, being "glued" with its viscous secretion, behaved much less aggressively in the follow-up experiments after 10 min and even 3 days, thus exhibiting the shaping of both short- and long-term memories. However, both "field" hunters and naïve foragers demonstrated no signs of aversive learning. These data provide some new insights into the relationship between task specialization and learning performance in ants. Given our previous results, we speculate that scouts and aphid milkers are the most cognitively gifted specialists in red wood ants, whereas hunters and guards are rather brave than smart.
个体专业化的适应性益处以及学习能力与任务表现之间的关联仍远未得到充分理解。红木蚁以其庞大的蚁群和高度的专业分工为特征。我们假设,红木蚁在与食蚜蝇幼虫有负面接触后会形成厌恶学习,但方式因任务专业化程度而异。我们通过以下方式验证这一假设:首先,检查猎手和蚜虫照料蚁在学习避免与食蚜蝇幼虫接触的滋扰方面是否存在差异;其次,分析“野外”觅食者和实验室饲养(无经验)的觅食者在学习上的差异。在与食蚜蝇幼虫的首次接触中,无经验的觅食者表现出比自然蚁群成员更高的攻击性。无经验的觅食者对敌人使用“致命抓握”“长时间撕咬”和“啃咬”的频率显著更高,而两个“野外”组的成员行为更为谨慎,试图避免与幼虫接触。有过与幼虫接触负面经历(被其粘性分泌物“粘住”)的蚜虫照料蚁,在后续10分钟甚至3天的实验中攻击性明显降低,从而表现出短期和长期记忆的形成。然而,“野外”猎手和无经验的觅食者都没有表现出厌恶学习的迹象。这些数据为蚂蚁的任务专业化与学习表现之间的关系提供了一些新见解。根据我们之前的结果,我们推测侦察蚁和蚜虫照料蚁是红木蚁中认知能力最强的专家,而猎手和守卫则是勇敢而非聪明。