• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将任务分离到不同领域,而非设置层面的兼容性,可最大程度减少双任务干扰。

Separation of Tasks Into Distinct Domains, Not Set-Level Compatibility, Minimizes Dual-Task Interference.

作者信息

Halvorson Kimberly M, Hazeltine Eliot

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Metropolitan State University, Saint Paul, MN, United States.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00711. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00711
PMID:30984091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6449443/
Abstract

Dual-task costs are often significantly reduced or eliminated when both tasks use compatible stimulus-response (S-R) pairs. Either by design or unintentionally, S-R pairs used in dual-task experiments that produce small dual-task costs typically have two properties that may reduce dual-task interference. One property is that they are easy to keep separate; specifically, one task is often visual-spatial and contains little verbal information and the other task is primarily auditory-verbal and has no significant spatial component. The other property is that the two sets of S-R pairs are often compatible at the set-level; specifically, the collection of stimuli for each task is strongly related to the collection of responses for that task, even if there is no direct correspondence between the individual items in the sets. In this paper, we directly test which of these two properties is driving the absence of large dual-task costs. We used stimuli (images of hands and auditory words) that when previously been paired with responses (button presses and vocal utterances) produced minimal dual-task costs, but we manipulated the shape of the hands in the images and the auditory words. If set-level compatibility is driving efficient performance, then these changes should not affect dual-task costs. However, we found large changes in the dual-task costs depending on the specific stimuli and responses. We conclude that set-level compatibility is not sufficient to minimize dual-task costs. We connect these findings to divisions within the working memory system and discuss implications for understanding dual-task performance more broadly.

摘要

当两个任务都使用兼容的刺激-反应(S-R)对时,双任务成本通常会显著降低或消除。无论是有意设计还是无意为之,在产生较小双任务成本的双任务实验中使用的S-R对通常具有两个可能减少双任务干扰的特性。一个特性是它们易于区分;具体来说,一个任务通常是视觉空间的,几乎不包含语言信息,而另一个任务主要是听觉语言的,没有显著的空间成分。另一个特性是两组S-R对在集合层面通常是兼容的;具体来说,每个任务的刺激集合与该任务的反应集合密切相关,即使集合中的单个项目之间没有直接对应关系。在本文中,我们直接测试这两个特性中的哪一个导致了没有大的双任务成本。我们使用了刺激(手的图像和听觉单词),这些刺激在之前与反应(按键和发声)配对时产生的双任务成本最小,但我们对图像中手的形状和听觉单词进行了操纵。如果集合层面的兼容性驱动了高效的表现,那么这些变化应该不会影响双任务成本。然而,我们发现双任务成本根据具体的刺激和反应有很大变化。我们得出结论,集合层面的兼容性不足以最小化双任务成本。我们将这些发现与工作记忆系统中的划分联系起来,并更广泛地讨论了对理解双任务表现的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c8/6449443/5ec5f44c2c47/fpsyg-10-00711-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c8/6449443/d8de5e0c8610/fpsyg-10-00711-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c8/6449443/afae75edb3bd/fpsyg-10-00711-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c8/6449443/5ec5f44c2c47/fpsyg-10-00711-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c8/6449443/d8de5e0c8610/fpsyg-10-00711-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c8/6449443/afae75edb3bd/fpsyg-10-00711-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c8/6449443/5ec5f44c2c47/fpsyg-10-00711-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Separation of Tasks Into Distinct Domains, Not Set-Level Compatibility, Minimizes Dual-Task Interference.将任务分离到不同领域,而非设置层面的兼容性,可最大程度减少双任务干扰。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00711. eCollection 2019.
2
Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.双任务中刺激-反应模态配对的干扰效应及其稳健性。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):476-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0368-x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
3
Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.通过最小化任务间串扰来消除双重任务成本:模态和特征配对的作用。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
4
Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.对视觉空间刺激的空间反应和对听觉字母的言语反应是观念运动兼容任务吗?对双重任务干扰中集合大小效应的考察。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Nov;129(3):352-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
5
Age-Related Interference between the Selection of Input-Output Modality Mappings and Postural Control-a Pilot Study.年龄相关的输入-输出模态映射选择与姿势控制之间的干扰——一项初步研究
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 21;8:613. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00613. eCollection 2017.
6
Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?小的双任务成本反映的是观念运动兼容性还是不存在串扰?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1403-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0813-8.
7
Dual-Task Processing With Identical Stimulus and Response Sets: Assessing the Importance of Task Representation in Dual-Task Interference.具有相同刺激和反应集的双任务处理:评估任务表征在双任务干扰中的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 25;9:1031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01031. eCollection 2018.
8
Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.触觉刺激增强任务切换中模态兼容性的效应。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(4):276-84. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000291. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
9
Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs.引发效应:刺激-动作效应模式兼容性和双重任务成本。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Apr;46(4):350-368. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000719.
10
Crossmodal Effects in Task Switching: Modality Compatibility with Vocal and Pedal Responses.任务切换中的跨通道效应:模态与语音和踏板反应的兼容性
J Cogn. 2021 Jan 21;4(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.129.

引用本文的文献

1
When more is less: Adding action effects to reduce crosstalk between concurrently performed tasks.事与愿违:添加动作效果以减少同时执行任务之间的串扰。
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105318. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105318. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs.引发效应:刺激-动作效应模式兼容性和双重任务成本。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Apr;46(4):350-368. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000719.

本文引用的文献

1
Dual-task automatization: The key role of sensory-motor modality compatibility.双重任务自动化:感觉运动模态兼容性的关键作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):752-772. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1469-4.
2
Abstract feature codes: The building blocks of the implicit learning system.摘要特征代码:内隐学习系统的组成要素。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jul;43(7):1275-1290. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000380. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
3
Vibrotactile cuing revisited to reveal a possible challenge to sensorimotor adaptation.重新审视振动触觉提示以揭示对感觉运动适应的一个潜在挑战。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Dec;234(12):3523-3530. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4750-1. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.通过最小化任务间串扰来消除双重任务成本:模态和特征配对的作用。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
5
Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?小的双任务成本反映的是观念运动兼容性还是不存在串扰?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1403-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0813-8.
6
Exceptions to the PRP effect? A comparison of prepared and unconditioned reflexes.PRP效应的例外情况?条件反射与非条件反射的比较。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):776-86. doi: 10.1037/a0035548. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
Investigating perfect timesharing: the relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dual-task performance.研究完美的分时处理:兼容即时通讯任务与双重任务表现之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):413-32. doi: 10.1037/a0029475. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
8
Crossmodal action: modality matters.跨模态动作:模态很重要。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):445-51. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0373-0.
9
The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.输入-输出模态兼容性在任务转换中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):491-8. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0353-4. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
10
The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.输入与输出模态配对在双重任务表现中的作用:内容依赖型中枢干扰的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Jun;52(4):291-345. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.11.001. Epub 2006 Apr 11.