• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型学术医疗中心校正后实验室结果的回顾性分析。

A Retrospective Analysis of Corrected Laboratory Results in a Large Academic Medical Center.

机构信息

Master of Science Clinical Laboratory Management Program, Rush University, Chicago, IL.

Core Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Jul 5;152(2):200-206. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz036.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqz036
PMID:30985883
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the total number of corrected laboratory results that occurred as a consequence of errors in the preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical phases of testing and to identify areas for improvement in patient care.

METHODS

Revised laboratory results were retroactively reviewed for a 6-month period. The total number of revised results were categorized by department and the phase in which the resulting error occurred.

RESULTS

Of 1,278,783 reportable tests, a total of 156 revisions were noted. Errors were predominately observed in the postanalytical phase of testing; 57.69% (n = 156) of all revisions were called and documented to a care provider.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring revised laboratory results is an important quality indicator that helps to identify areas within the laboratory that warrant improvement. Education, training, and ongoing process improvement initiatives are essential parts of a laboratory's quality management system in order to limit the total number of future revisions.

摘要

目的

评估由于检验前、检验中和检验后分析阶段的错误而导致的纠正实验室结果的总数,并确定改善患者护理的领域。

方法

对 6 个月的时间内的修订实验室结果进行回顾性审查。根据部门和导致错误的阶段对修订结果的总数进行分类。

结果

在可报告的 1,278,783 次检测中,共注意到 156 次修订。错误主要发生在检验的检验后阶段;所有修订中有 57.69%(n = 156)被电话通知并记录在护理提供者的病历中。

结论

监测修订后的实验室结果是一个重要的质量指标,有助于确定实验室中需要改进的领域。教育、培训和持续的流程改进举措是实验室质量管理系统的重要组成部分,以限制未来修订的总数。

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Analysis of Corrected Laboratory Results in a Large Academic Medical Center.大型学术医疗中心校正后实验室结果的回顾性分析。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Jul 5;152(2):200-206. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz036.
2
Evaluation of quality indicators in a laboratory supporting tertiary cancer care facilities in India.印度一家为三级癌症护理机构提供支持的实验室的质量指标评估。
Lab Med. 2014 Summer;45(3):272-7. doi: 10.1309/LMP0E6DVC0OSLYIS.
3
Study of the Pre-Analytical Phase of an ISO 15189: 2012-Certified Cytopathology Laboratory: A 5-Year Institutional Experience.一家获得ISO 15189: 2012认证的细胞病理学实验室的分析前阶段研究:一项为期5年的机构经验
Acta Cytol. 2019;63(1):56-62. doi: 10.1159/000494567. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
4
Evaluation of preanalytical and postanalytical phases in clinical biochemistry laboratory according to IFCC laboratory errors and patient safety specifications.根据国际临床化学联合会(IFCC)实验室误差和患者安全规范评估临床生物化学实验室的分析前和分析后阶段。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Oct 1;32(3):030701. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.030701. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management.临床实验室管理中分析后阶段的质量指标与规范
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;42(6):578-82. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.100.
6
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" project.临床实验室检验质量指标:国际临床化学联合会工作组“检验误差及患者安全”项目进展状况。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):348-357. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0929.
7
Quality indicators and specifications for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminary experience.临床实验室关键流程的质量指标与规范:初步经验
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(5):672-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.122.
8
An error management system in a veterinary clinical laboratory.兽医临床实验室中的差错管理系统。
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2012 May;24(3):458-68. doi: 10.1177/1040638712441782.
9
Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.通过教育和技术干预减少分析前实验室样本误差。
Clin Lab. 2012;58(9-10):911-7.
10
Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).分析前质量改进。追求和谐,代表欧洲临床化学和实验室医学联合会(EFLM)分析前阶段工作组(WG-PRE)。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Feb;53(3):357-70. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1051.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Test Result Recall Supporting System (CTR RSS) Improves Follow-Up among Patients in the Community.危急检验结果召回支持系统(CTR RSS)改善了社区患者的随访情况。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 18;12(5):1252. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051252.
2
Errors within the total laboratory testing process, from test selection to medical decision-making - A review of causes, consequences, surveillance and solutions.实验室检验全过程中的误差:从检验选择到临床决策——原因、后果、监测和解决方案的综述
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020 Jun 15;30(2):020502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2020.020502.