• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实验室关键流程的质量指标与规范:初步经验

Quality indicators and specifications for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminary experience.

作者信息

Kirchner Maria Jesus Alsina, Funes Virtudes Alvarez, Adzet Carme Biosca, Clar Maria Vicenta Doménech, Escuer Mercè Ibarz, Girona Joana Minchinela, Barellas Rosa Maria Pastor, Alsina Carmen Perich, Aguilá Carmen Ricós, Isern Gloria Trujillo, Navarro Conrad Vilanova

机构信息

Laboratori Clínic Barcelonès Nord i Vallès Oriental, Badalona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(5):672-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.122.

DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2007.122
PMID:17484633
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify process indicators for the three phases of laboratory activity and their corresponding quality specifications in our setting (primary care centers, and second- and third-level hospitals that provide public healthcare services in Catalonia).

METHODS

Every 2 months, working group members met to present data obtained for quality indicators for the current processes in their laboratories. The results collected were for indicators recorded monthly from 2005 and for indicators recorded less frequently from 2004. The medians of the results obtained in all laboratories were calculated and the values obtained were established as the current specifications for the corresponding indicators.

RESULTS

The laboratories participating in this working group use 12 indicators for the key processes (three for preanalytical steps, four for analytical steps and five for postanalytical steps). The preanalytical indicators are erroneous request, erroneous sample, and samples not taken, with specifications of 4.1%, 5.0% and 1.7%, respectively. A new indicator for the analytical step is the percentage of external controls exceeding the specification (0.8%); specifications for the other three well-recognized indicators (imprecision, bias and total error) are not the subject of this study. For the postanalytical phase, the indicators (and specifications) include duplicate hard copies of reports sent to centers or clinical units (1.6%), failure in critical value reporting (0.5%), reports exceeding delivery time (0.7%), reports from referred tests that exceed delivery time (8.9%), and incidents related to the data processing network between centers (25 events per year).

CONCLUSIONS

The process indicators reflect the state-of-the-art of the laboratories comprising our working group. Current performance for the analytical phase is satisfactory because it is entirely in the hands of the laboratory, while the main problems in extra-analytical phases reside in activities performed outside the laboratory (sample collection and transport, as well as non-electronic report delivery).

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是确定实验室活动三个阶段的过程指标及其在我们所处环境(加泰罗尼亚提供公共医疗服务的基层医疗中心以及二级和三级医院)中的相应质量规范。

方法

每两个月,工作组成员会面,汇报各自实验室当前流程质量指标所获取的数据。收集的结果包括2005年起每月记录的指标以及2004年记录频率较低的指标。计算所有实验室所得结果的中位数,并将所得值确定为相应指标的当前规范。

结果

参与该工作组的实验室在关键流程中使用12项指标(分析前步骤3项、分析步骤4项、分析后步骤5项)。分析前指标为错误申请、错误样本和未采集样本,其规范分别为4.1%、5.0%和1.7%。分析步骤的一项新指标是超出规范的外部对照百分比(0.8%);其他三项公认指标(不精密度、偏差和总误差)的规范并非本研究的主题。对于分析后阶段,指标(及规范)包括发送至各中心或临床科室的报告硬拷贝重复件(1.6%)、危急值报告失败(0.5%)、报告超出交付时间(0.7%)、转诊检测报告超出交付时间(8.9%)以及各中心之间数据处理网络相关事件(每年25起)。

结论

过程指标反映了构成我们工作组的各实验室的最新情况。分析阶段的当前表现令人满意,因为这完全由实验室掌控,而分析外阶段的主要问题存在于实验室外部开展的活动(样本采集与运输以及非电子报告交付)中。

相似文献

1
Quality indicators and specifications for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminary experience.临床实验室关键流程的质量指标与规范:初步经验
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(5):672-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.122.
2
Quality indicators and specifications for key analytical-extranalytical processes in the clinical laboratory. Five years' experience using the Six Sigma concept.临床实验室关键分析-实验过程的质量指标和规范。使用六西格玛概念五年的经验。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Mar;49(3):463-70. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.067. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
3
Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management.临床实验室管理中分析后阶段的质量指标与规范
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;42(6):578-82. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.100.
4
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety".临床实验室检验质量指标:从理论到实践. IFCC 工作组项目"检验误差与患者安全"的初步数据
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 May;49(5):835-44. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.128. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
5
Indicators and quality specifications for strategic and support processes related to the clinical laboratory: four years' experience.与临床实验室相关的战略和支持过程的指标和质量规范:四年经验。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010 Jul;48(7):1015-9. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.229.
6
Evaluation of preanalytical and postanalytical phases in clinical biochemistry laboratory according to IFCC laboratory errors and patient safety specifications.根据国际临床化学联合会(IFCC)实验室误差和患者安全规范评估临床生物化学实验室的分析前和分析后阶段。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Oct 1;32(3):030701. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.030701. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases of laboratory testing: Why and how.实验室检测分析前阶段的性能规范:原因与方法。
Clin Biochem. 2017 Jul;50(10-11):550-554. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
8
Quality indicators and specifications for strategic and support processes in laboratory medicine.检验医学中战略与支持流程的质量指标及规范
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(8):1189-94. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.225.
9
National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017.2015 年至 2017 年中国临床实验室总检测过程的 15 项质量指标的全国性调查。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Dec 19;57(2):195-203. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0416.
10
Preliminary probe of quality indicators and quality specification in total testing process in 5753 laboratories in China.中国 5753 家实验室全检验过程的质量指标和质量规范初探。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Aug 1;54(8):1337-45. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0958.

引用本文的文献

1
Monkeypox Diagnosis in Clinical Settings: A Comprehensive Review of Best Laboratory Practices.临床环境中的猴痘诊断:最佳实验室实践综合述评。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1451:253-271. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-57165-7_16.
2
Internal quality control - past, present and future trends.内部质量控制——过去、现在和未来趋势
Adv Lab Med. 2022 May 23;3(3):243-262. doi: 10.1515/almed-2022-0029. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Three years' experience of quality monitoring program on pre-analytical errors in china.中国分析前误差质量监测计划的三年经验。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Mar;35(3):e23699. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23699. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
4
Promoting early autism detection and intervention in underserved communities: study protocol for a pragmatic trial using a stepped-wedge design.促进服务不足社区的早期自闭症检测和干预:使用阶梯式楔形设计的实用试验研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2150-3.
5
The Effects of Education and Training Given to Phlebotomists for Reducing Preanalytical Errors.对采血人员进行教育和培训以减少分析前误差的效果。
J Med Biochem. 2018 Apr 1;37(2):172-180. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2017-0045. eCollection 2018 Apr.
6
Errors in the Total Testing Process in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory at the University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔大学医院临床化学实验室总检测过程中的误差
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 Mar;28(2):235-244. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i2.15.
7
Consensus Statement for the Management and Communication of High Risk Laboratory Results.高风险实验室结果管理与沟通的共识声明
Clin Biochem Rev. 2015 Aug;36(3):97-105.
8
Ten years of preanalytical monitoring and control: Synthetic Balanced Score Card Indicator.十年的预分析监测与控制:综合平衡计分卡指标。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25(1):49-56. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.005.
9
Clinical biochemistry laboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalytical errors.由于各类分析前误差导致的临床生物化学实验室拒收率
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014 Oct 15;24(3):376-82. doi: 10.11613/BM.2014.040. eCollection 2014.
10
Impact of a large-scale educational intervention program on venous blood specimen collection practices.大规模教育干预计划对静脉血标本采集实践的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 5;13:463. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-463.