Cao Hanxue, Shen Chao, Wang Chengcheng, Xu Hui, Zhu Juanjuan
Materials Forming and Control Department, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 2;12(7):1099. doi: 10.3390/ma12071099.
Although numerical simulation accuracy makes progress rapidly, it is in an insufficient phase because of complicated phenomena of the filling process and difficulty of experimental verification in high pressure die casting (HPDC), especially in thin-wall complex die-castings. Therefore, in this paper, a flow visualization experiment is conducted, and the porosity at different locations is predicted under three different fast shot velocities. The differences in flow pattern between the actual filling process and the numerical simulation are compared. It shows that the flow visualization experiment can directly observe the actual and real-time filling process and could be an effective experimental verification method for the accuracy of the flow simulation model in HPDC. Moreover, significant differences start to appear in the flow pattern between the actual experiment and the Anycasting solution after the fragment or atomization formation. Finally, the fast shot velocity would determine the position at which the back flow meets the incoming flow. The junction of two streams of fluid would create more porosity than the other location. There is a transition in flow patterns due to drag crisis under high fast shot velocity around two staggered cylinders, which resulted in the porosity relationship also changing from R1 < R3 < R2 (0.88 m/s) to R1 < R2 < R3 (1.59 and 2.34 m/s).
尽管数值模拟精度迅速提高,但由于高压压铸(HPDC)填充过程现象复杂且实验验证困难,尤其是在薄壁复杂压铸件中,其仍处于不足阶段。因此,本文进行了流动可视化实验,并预测了三种不同快速注射速度下不同位置的孔隙率。比较了实际填充过程与数值模拟之间的流动模式差异。结果表明,流动可视化实验能够直接观察实际实时填充过程,并且可以成为验证HPDC流动模拟模型准确性的有效实验方法。此外,在碎片或雾化形成后,实际实验与Anycasting解决方案之间的流动模式开始出现显著差异。最后,快速注射速度将决定回流与入流相遇的位置。两股流体的交汇处会比其他位置产生更多孔隙率。在两个交错圆柱体周围的高快速注射速度下,由于阻力危机,流动模式会发生转变,这也导致孔隙率关系从R1 < R3 < R2(0.88 m/s)变为R1 < R2 < R3(1.59和2.34 m/s)。