Suppr超能文献

骨骼与软骨锐器伤分析:文献综述

Sharp force trauma analysis in bone and cartilage: A literature review.

作者信息

Love Jennifer C

机构信息

Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, 401 E Street, Washington, DC, 20024, United States.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Jun;299:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.035. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

Abstract

Sharp force trauma (SFT) in bone and cartilage has been studied extensively. This literature review summarizes knife and saw mark research. Researchers have documented several features of cut surfaces and successfully associated them with various tool characteristics. Most study designs are based on light microscopic examination, but other technologies such as micro-computed scanning, scanning electron microscope, and epifluorescence microscopy have been investigated. Researchers have worked with human and non-human material, and found that the presentation of SFT differs between the two. Furthermore, they have designed studies to control the parameters surrounding SFT (e.g., tool angle, force, direction) as well as not to control these parameters (real-world scenario) and have found that the trauma produced in the two scenarios differ considerably. Researchers have attempted to calculate the error rate associated with cut and saw mark analysis and have reported very different results. Several high profile cases of successful SFT analysis have been published and are briefly reviewed. Expert testimony based on cut and saw mark analysis has been found admissible, but not in all cases. Unfortunately, researchers have not consistently used standard terminology, a list of terms gathered from the literature is provided. Despite the extensive research, more work is needed. Methods that mitigate potential sources of error that are not dependent on analyst's experience must be developed.

摘要

骨骼和软骨中的锐器伤(SFT)已得到广泛研究。这篇文献综述总结了刀痕和锯痕研究。研究人员记录了切割表面的几个特征,并成功地将它们与各种工具特征联系起来。大多数研究设计基于光学显微镜检查,但也研究了其他技术,如微型计算机扫描、扫描电子显微镜和落射荧光显微镜。研究人员使用了人类和非人类材料,发现两者的锐器伤表现有所不同。此外,他们设计了研究来控制围绕锐器伤的参数(如工具角度、力、方向)以及不控制这些参数(实际场景),并发现两种场景下产生的创伤有很大差异。研究人员试图计算与切割和锯痕分析相关的错误率,并报告了非常不同的结果。已经发表了几起成功进行锐器伤分析的备受瞩目的案例,并进行了简要回顾。基于切割和锯痕分析的专家证词已被认定可采信,但并非在所有案例中都如此。不幸的是,研究人员并未始终使用标准术语,本文提供了从文献中收集的术语列表。尽管进行了广泛研究,但仍需开展更多工作。必须开发出减少不依赖分析师经验的潜在误差来源的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验