The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1317-1321.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
Alternative payment models such the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative have been effective in reducing costs following unilateral total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), but few studies exist on bilateral arthroplasty. This study aimed to determine whether the BPCI program for bilateral THA and TKA reduced episode-of-care costs.
We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral primary THA and TKA between 2015 and 2016. We recorded demographic variables, comorbidities, readmissions, and calculated 90-day episode-of-care costs based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data. We compared data from patients before and after the start of our BPCI program, and performed a multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for increased costs.
Of 319 patients, 38 underwent bilateral THA (12%) while 287 underwent bilateral TKA (88%). There were 239 patients (74%) in the bundled payment group. Although there was no change in readmission rate (9% vs 8%), the post-BPCI group demonstrated reduced hospital costs ($21,251 vs $18,783), post-acute care costs ($15,488 vs $12,439), and overall 90-day episode-of-care costs ($39,733 vs $34,305). When controlling for demographics, procedure, and comorbidities, our BPCI model demonstrated a per-patient reduction of $5811 in overall claims costs. Additional risk factors for increased episode-of-care costs included age ($516/y increase) and cardiac disease ($5916).
Our bundled payment program for bilateral THA and TKA was successful with reduction in 90-day episode-of-care costs without placing the patient at higher risk of readmission. Older Medicare beneficiaries and those with cardiac disease should likely not undergo a simultaneous bilateral procedure due to concerns about increased costs.
医保和医疗补助服务中心的支付模式,如捆绑支付改善护理(BPCI)计划,在单侧全髋关节置换术(THA)和膝关节置换术(TKA)后降低成本方面非常有效,但关于双侧关节置换术的研究很少。本研究旨在确定双侧 THA 和 TKA 的 BPCI 计划是否降低了治疗过程中的成本。
我们回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2016 年间连续进行的同期双侧初次 THA 和 TKA 的患者。我们记录了人口统计学变量、合并症、再入院情况,并根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的索赔数据计算了 90 天的治疗过程成本。我们比较了 BPCI 计划开始前后患者的数据,并进行了多变量分析,以确定增加成本的独立危险因素。
在 319 名患者中,38 名患者接受了双侧 THA(12%),287 名患者接受了双侧 TKA(88%)。有 239 名患者(74%)在捆绑支付组中。虽然再入院率没有变化(9%比 8%),但 BPCI 组的住院费用(21251 美元比 18783 美元)、急性后护理费用(15488 美元比 12439 美元)和整体 90 天治疗过程费用(39733 美元比 34305 美元)均有所降低。在控制了人口统计学、手术和合并症等因素后,我们的 BPCI 模型显示每位患者的总索赔成本降低了 5811 美元。增加治疗过程成本的其他危险因素包括年龄(每年增加 516 美元)和心脏病(增加 5916 美元)。
我们的双侧 THA 和 TKA 捆绑支付计划成功降低了 90 天治疗过程中的成本,而不会使患者再入院的风险增加。年龄较大的 Medicare 受益人和心脏病患者由于担心成本增加,可能不适合同时进行双侧手术。