• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致编辑的信:回应“是时候制定关于精神病患者身体约束的国际指南了吗?”

Letter to the editor in response to "Is it time for international guidelines on physical restraint in psychiatric patients?".

作者信息

Cioffi A, Tomassini L

机构信息

Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Ter. 2019 Mar-Apr;170(2):e108-e109. doi: 10.7417/CT.2019.2119.

DOI:10.7417/CT.2019.2119
PMID:30993306
Abstract

The Mastrogiovanni case was a revolutionary case in the field of Italian forensic psychiatry. A recent judgment of the Court of Cassation has defined what the legal limits of mechanical restraint should be. On the other hand, even today, there is a gap in the scientific community about the presence of guidelines governing mechanical restraint. It is probably time to create specific guidelines to protect the psychiatric patient and the mental health worker.

摘要

马斯特罗乔瓦尼案是意大利法医精神病学领域的一个具有革命性的案例。最高上诉法院最近的一项判决确定了机械约束的法律界限。另一方面,即使在今天,科学界在关于机械约束的指导方针方面仍存在差距。或许是时候制定具体的指导方针来保护精神病患者和精神卫生工作者了。

相似文献

1
Letter to the editor in response to "Is it time for international guidelines on physical restraint in psychiatric patients?".致编辑的信:回应“是时候制定关于精神病患者身体约束的国际指南了吗?”
Clin Ter. 2019 Mar-Apr;170(2):e108-e109. doi: 10.7417/CT.2019.2119.
2
Seclusion and restraint Q and A.隔离与约束问答
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2004 Dec;42(12):8; author reply 8, 11. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20041201-02.
3
Case law and clinical considerations involving physical restraint and seclusion for institutionalized persons with mental disabilities.
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep. 1999 Jul-Aug;23(4):597-602.
4
[The respectful compulsion. Evidence and ethics in compulsory psychiatric care].[尊重性强制。强制精神科护理中的证据与伦理]
Lakartidningen. 2009;106(11):750-1.
5
Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients. a case vignette study in 16 European countries.暴力患者管理中的法律规定与实践。一项对16个欧洲国家的病例 vignette 研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;24(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 May 2.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Sep;46(5):447-450. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000616.
7
Response to letter to the Editor regarding physical restraint in psychiatric setting.对致编辑的关于精神科环境中身体约束问题的信件的回复。
Clin Ter. 2019 Jul-Aug;170(4):e245-e246. doi: 10.7417/CT.2019.2141.
8
As time goes by: reasons and characteristics of prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint in forensic psychiatry.随着时间的推移:法医精神病学中机械约束长期发作的原因及特征
J Forensic Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):41-50. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000055.
9
Is it time for international guidelines on physical restraint in psychiatric patients?现在是制定精神科患者身体约束国际指南的时候了吗?
Clin Ter. 2019 Jan-Feb;170(1):e68-e70. doi: 10.7417/CT.2019.2110.
10
Legal issues in maximum security institutions for people with mental illness: liberty, security, and administrative discretion.为患有精神疾病者设立的高度戒备机构中的法律问题:自由、安全与行政自由裁量权。
Behav Sci Law. 2002;20(5):463-80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.505.