• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奇怪的盟友:美国原住民部落、大型制药公司及其联盟的合法性

Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance.

作者信息

Kennedy Daniel C

出版信息

Duke Law J. 2019 Apr;68(7):1433-68.

PMID:30995705
Abstract

Lost in the cacophony surrounding the debate about high drug prices is the fundamental principle that pharmaceutical innovation will not occur without the prospect of outsized returns enabled through market exclusivity. Biopharmaceutical patents are currently under siege, subject to challenge both in inter partes review ("IPR") proceedings and in Hatch-Waxman actions. These twin assaults threaten to eliminate the incentives necessary for biotechnological innovation--particularly for discoveries made upstream in the innovation pipeline--thus imperiling the development of new drug therapies. But a fascinating solution has emerged: invoking tribal immunity to shield pharmaceutical patents from IPR before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"). This serves two critically important objectives: promoting tribal self-sufficiency, and encouraging investment in life-saving and life-improving new drugs. Contractual partnerships between Native American tribes and pharmaceutical companies not only provide the tribes with a steady stream of royalty revenue, but also insulate biopharmaceutical patents from challenge in IPR proceedings through the invocation of long-established principles of tribal sovereign immunity. This Note is the first piece of scholarship to comprehensively analyze, and advocate for, the right to invoke tribal sovereign immunity in IPR proceedings.

摘要

在围绕高药价的争论所产生的喧嚣声中,有一个基本原则被忽视了,即如果没有通过市场独占权获得巨额回报的前景,制药创新就不会发生。生物制药专利目前正受到围攻,在双方复审(“IPR”)程序和哈奇 - 瓦克斯曼诉讼中都面临挑战。这双重攻击有可能消除生物技术创新所需的激励措施,尤其是对创新流程上游所取得的发现而言,从而危及新药疗法的开发。但一个引人入胜的解决方案出现了:援引部落豁免权,在专利审判和上诉委员会(“PTAB”)面前保护制药专利免受IPR的影响。这实现了两个至关重要的目标:促进部落自给自足,并鼓励对拯救生命和改善生活的新药进行投资。美国原住民部落与制药公司之间的契约伙伴关系不仅为部落提供了源源不断的版税收入,还通过援引长期确立的部落主权豁免原则,使生物制药专利在IPR程序中免受质疑。本评论文章是第一篇全面分析并倡导在IPR程序中援引部落主权豁免权的学术文章。

相似文献

1
Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance.奇怪的盟友:美国原住民部落、大型制药公司及其联盟的合法性
Duke Law J. 2019 Apr;68(7):1433-68.
2
An Administrative Meter Maid: Using Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review to Curb Exclusivity Parking via the "Failure to Market" Provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act.一位行政抄表员:利用双方复审和授权后复审,通过《哈奇-沃克斯曼法案》的“未上市”条款来遏制排他性专利。
Mich Law Rev. 2015;114(1):107-36.
3
Inter Partes Review: Patent Killer No More?专利无效宣告:专利杀手不再?
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Jul;37(7):680-683. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
4
How Cuozzo will impact the interplay between post grant proceedings and Hatch-Waxman litigation.
Pharm Pat Anal. 2017 Jan;6(1):9-15. doi: 10.4155/ppa-2016-0041. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
Intellectual property law in Israel, and US and European objections: Market exclusivity vs. data exclusivity.以色列的知识产权法以及美国和欧洲的反对意见:市场独占权与数据独占权。
Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Dec;22(12):1591-2. doi: 10.1038/nbt1204-1591.
6
Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.令人不安的药品专利和解:推定非法性的框架。
Mich Law Rev. 2009 Oct;108(1):37-80.
7
Implications of review proceedings on biotech/pharma litigation.
Pharm Pat Anal. 2019 May;8(3):65-70. doi: 10.4155/ppa-2019-0010.
8
The Generic Drug Industry Embraces a Faster, Cheaper Pathway for Challenging Patents.仿制药行业采用更快、更便宜的途径来挑战专利。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Feb;17(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0420-8.
9
Revitalizing the patent system to incentivize pharmaceutical innovation: the potential of claims with means-plus-function clauses.振兴专利制度以激励药物创新:权利要求中手段-功能特征的潜力。
Duke Law J. 2013 Feb;62(5):1069-108.
10
Using market-exclusivity incentives to promote pharmaceutical innovation.利用市场独占激励措施促进药物创新。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 4;363(19):1855-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle1002961.