• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用精益思维改善社区卫生中心的高血压管理:一份质量改进报告。

Using lean thinking to improve hypertension in a community health centre: a quality improvement report.

作者信息

Lee Patrick, Pham Linhchi, Oakley Stephen, Eng Kimberly, Freydin Elena, Rose Tayla, Ruiz Alyssa, Reen Joyce, Suleyman Deborah, Altman Vanna, Keating Bench Kara, Lee Alice, Mahaniah Kiame

机构信息

Medicine, North Shore Medical Center, Salem, Massachusetts, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Feb 8;8(1):e000373. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000373. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000373
PMID:30997412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6440610/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving better care at lower cost in the US healthcare safety net will require federally qualified health centres (FQHC) to implement new models of team-based population healthcare. Lean thinking may offer a way to reduce the financial risk of practice transformation while increasing the likelihood of sustained improvement.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate system-level improvement in hypertension control in a large FQHC through the situational use of lean thinking and statistical process control.

SETTING

Lynn Community Health Center, the third largest FQHC in Massachusetts, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

4762 adult patients with a diagnosis of hypertension.

INTERVENTION

First, we created an organisation-wide focus on hypertension. Second, we implemented a multicomponent hypertension care pathway. The lean tools of strategy deployment, standardised work, job instruction, Plan-Do-Study-Adjust, 5S and visual control were used to overcome specific obstacles in the implementation.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was hypertension control, defined as last measured blood pressure <140/90. Statistical process control was used to establish baseline performance and assess special cause variation resulting from the two-step intervention.

RESULTS

Hypertension control improved by 11.6% from a baseline of 66.8% to a 6 month average of 78.2%.

LIMITATIONS

Durability of system changes has not been demonstrated beyond the 14-month period of the intervention. The observed improvement may underestimate the effect size of the full hypertension care pathway, as two of the five steps have only been partially implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

Success factors included experienced improvement leaders, a focus on engaging front-line staff, the situational use of lean principles to make the work easier, better, faster and cheaper (in that order of emphasis), and the use of statistical process control to learn from variation. The challenge of transforming care delivery in the safety net warrants a closer look at the principles, relevance and potential impact of lean thinking in FQHCs.

摘要

背景

在美国医疗安全网中以更低成本实现更好的医疗服务,将要求联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)实施基于团队的人群医疗新模式。精益思维可能提供一种降低实践转型财务风险的方法,同时增加持续改进的可能性。

目的

通过情境化运用精益思维和统计过程控制,展示在大型FQHC中高血压控制的系统层面改善。

地点

美国马萨诸塞州第三大FQHC——林恩社区健康中心。

参与者

4762名诊断为高血压的成年患者。

干预措施

首先,我们在全组织范围内聚焦高血压。其次,我们实施了多组分高血压护理路径。运用战略部署、标准化工作、工作指导、计划-执行-研究-调整、5S和可视化控制等精益工具来克服实施过程中的特定障碍。

测量指标

主要结局为高血压控制,定义为末次测量血压<140/90。使用统计过程控制来建立基线表现,并评估两步干预导致的特殊原因变异。

结果

高血压控制率从基线的66.8%提高了11.6%,6个月平均达到78.2%。

局限性

干预的14个月之后,尚未证明系统变化的持久性。观察到的改善可能低估了完整高血压护理路径的效应大小,因为五个步骤中的两个仅部分实施。

结论

成功因素包括经验丰富的改进领导者、注重让一线员工参与、情境化运用精益原则以使工作更轻松、更好、更快且更便宜(按此重点顺序),以及使用统计过程控制从变异中学习。在安全网中转变护理服务的挑战,值得更深入地审视精益思维在FQHC中的原则、相关性和潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/ebcd5e1cea75/bmjoq-2018-000373f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/0a79bc7ec4a1/bmjoq-2018-000373f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/13ce179935ab/bmjoq-2018-000373f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/188aad0f8fd0/bmjoq-2018-000373f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/f33fd3304b96/bmjoq-2018-000373f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/ebcd5e1cea75/bmjoq-2018-000373f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/0a79bc7ec4a1/bmjoq-2018-000373f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/13ce179935ab/bmjoq-2018-000373f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/188aad0f8fd0/bmjoq-2018-000373f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/f33fd3304b96/bmjoq-2018-000373f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbdf/6440610/ebcd5e1cea75/bmjoq-2018-000373f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Using lean thinking to improve hypertension in a community health centre: a quality improvement report.运用精益思维改善社区卫生中心的高血压管理:一份质量改进报告。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Feb 8;8(1):e000373. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000373. eCollection 2019.
2
LEAN thinking in Finnish healthcare.芬兰医疗保健中的精益思维。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2016;29(1):9-36. doi: 10.1108/LHS-08-2015-0021.
3
Lean Thinking for Primary Care.基层医疗的精益思维
Prim Care. 2019 Dec;46(4):515-527. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
Acceptance of lean redesigns in primary care: A contextual analysis.接受基层医疗中的精益再设计:一项情境分析。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Jul/Sep;42(3):203-212. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000106.
5
Using a Cohort-Based Quality Improvement Coaching Model to Optimize Chronic Disease Management for Federally Qualified Health Center Patients.利用基于队列的质量改进辅导模型来优化联邦合格健康中心患者的慢性病管理。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30:S52-S61. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001902. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
6
Applying Lean Six Sigma to improve medication management.应用精益六西格玛改善药物管理。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29(1):16-23. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2015-0020.
7
The promise of Lean in health care.精益医疗的承诺。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Jan;88(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.025.
8
Lean management in academic surgery.学术外科中的精益管理。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jun;214(6):928-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.002.
9
Quality and process improvement of the multidisciplinary Heart Team meeting using Lean Six Sigma.运用精益六西格玛提高多学科心脏团队会议的质量和流程改进。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002050.
10
Patient Engagement in Community Health Center Leadership: How Does it Happen?患者参与社区卫生中心领导:它是如何发生的?
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1069-1074. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0523-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A Policy and Regulatory Framework to Promote Care Delivery Redesign and Production Efficiency in Health Care Markets.促进医疗保健市场护理服务重新设计与生产效率的政策和监管框架。
Milbank Q. 2025 Jun;103(2):316-348. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.70016. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
Cost-Effectiveness and Challenges of Implementing Intensive Blood Pressure Goals and Team-Based Care.实施强化血压目标和基于团队的护理的成本效益和挑战。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019 Nov 7;21(12):91. doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0996-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Can lean contribute to work intensification in healthcare?精益能否有助于医疗保健工作的强化?
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 May 15;31(3):369-384. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2016-0219.
2
Controlling the Cost of Medicaid.控制医疗补助成本
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 20;377(3):201-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1705487. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
3
Moving in the Wrong Direction - Health Care under the AHCA.朝着错误的方向前进——《美国医保法案》下的医疗保健
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 22;376(25):2405-2407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1706848. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Health Care Use and Spending for Medicaid Enrollees in Federally Qualified Health Centers Versus Other Primary Care Settings.联邦合格健康中心与其他初级保健机构中医疗补助参保者的医疗服务利用及支出情况
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1981-1989. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303341. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
5
Medical Taylorism, Lean, and Toyota.医学泰勒制、精益生产与丰田生产方式
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 19;374(20):1993. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1602596.
6
Lean interventions in healthcare: do they actually work? A systematic literature review.医疗保健中的精益干预措施:它们真的有效吗?一项系统的文献综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):150-65. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv123. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
7
Medical Taylorism.医学泰勒制
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):106-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512402.
8
Comparing the Cost of Caring for Medicare Beneficiaries in Federally Funded Health Centers to Other Care Settings.比较联邦资助的健康中心为医疗保险受益人提供护理的成本与其他护理环境的成本。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;51(2):625-44. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12339. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
9
From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.从三重目标到四重目标:照顾患者需要照顾医疗服务提供者。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.
10
Lean management in health care: definition, concepts, methodology and effects reported (systematic review protocol).医疗保健中的精益管理:定义、概念、方法及所报告的效果(系统评价方案)
Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 19;3:103. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-103.