• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Power behind the throne: A clinical trial simulation study evaluating the impact of controllable design factors on the power of antidepressant trials.幕后的力量:一项评估可控设计因素对抗抑郁试验功效影响的临床试验模拟研究。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Sep;28(3):e1779. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1779. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
From trial and error to trial simulation. Part 2: an appraisal of current beliefs in the design and analysis of clinical trials for antidepressant drugs.从试错到试验模拟。第2部分:对抗抑郁药物临床试验设计与分析中当前观念的评估
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep;86(3):255-62. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.107. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
3
Getting what you ask for: on the selectivity of depression rating scales.得偿所愿:论抑郁评定量表的选择性
Psychother Psychosom. 2003 Mar-Apr;72(2):61-70. doi: 10.1159/000068690.
4
Efficacy of new-generation antidepressants assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the gold standard clinician rating scale: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.新一代抗抑郁药在蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(金标准临床医生评定量表)评估中的疗效:一项随机安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 26;15(2):e0229381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229381. eCollection 2020.
5
Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from major depressive disorder trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in support of new drug applications.探索性分析美国食品和药物管理局支持新药申请的主要抑郁症试验的疗效数据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;72(4):464-72. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06191.
6
A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of nonmajor chronic depression.度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗非重症慢性抑郁症的随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):984-91. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07230.
7
Systematic reviews of randomised clinical trials examining the effects of psychotherapeutic interventions versus "no intervention" for acute major depressive disorder and a randomised trial examining the effects of "third wave" cognitive therapy versus mentalization-based treatment for acute major depressive disorder.对比较心理治疗干预与“无干预”对急性重度抑郁症影响的随机临床试验的系统评价,以及一项比较“第三波”认知疗法与基于心理化的治疗对急性重度抑郁症影响的随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2014 Oct;61(10):B4942.
8
Initial severity and antidepressant efficacy for anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder: An individual patient data meta-analysis.初始严重程度与焦虑障碍、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍的抗抑郁疗效:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jun;35(6):515-522. doi: 10.1002/da.22737. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
From trial and error to trial simulation. Part 1: the importance of model-based drug development for antidepressant drugs.从试错到试验模拟。第1部分:基于模型的抗抑郁药物研发的重要性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep;86(3):248-54. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.105. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
10
Are antidepressants overrated? A review of methodological problems in antidepressant trials.抗抑郁药被高估了吗?抗抑郁药试验中的方法学问题综述。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001 May;189(5):288-95. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200105000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Are large prospective trials on antidepressants in mental disorders seeding trials? A descriptive study of trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.抗抑郁药治疗精神障碍的大型前瞻性试验是否在播种试验?ClinicalTrials.gov 注册试验的描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e062913. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062913.
2
Consistently Modest Antidepressant Effects in Clinical Trials: the Role of Regulatory Requirements.临床试验中持续存在的抗抑郁药疗效不显著:监管要求的作用。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2021 Jun 1;51(3):79-108.

本文引用的文献

1
The conundrum of depression clinical trials: one size does not fit all.抑郁症临床试验的难题:一刀切并不适用。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Sep;33(5):239-248. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000229.
2
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Is placebo response in antidepressant trials rising or not? A reanalysis of datasets to conclude this long-lasting controversy.抗抑郁药试验中的安慰剂反应是在增加还是没有增加?重新分析数据集以结束这场旷日持久的争议。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Feb;21(1):1-3. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102827. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
4
Measuring depression over time . . . Or not? Lack of unidimensionality and longitudinal measurement invariance in four common rating scales of depression.随时间测量抑郁……还是不测量?四种常用抑郁评定量表缺乏单维性和纵向测量不变性。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1354-1367. doi: 10.1037/pas0000275. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
Antidepressants: misnamed and misrepresented.抗抑郁药:名称不当且表述有误。
World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):302-3. doi: 10.1002/wps.20243.
6
The Network Structure of Symptoms of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》症状的网络结构
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0137621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137621. eCollection 2015.
7
Empirically derived criteria cast doubt on the clinical significance of antidepressant-placebo differences.基于经验得出的标准对抗抑郁药与安慰剂差异的临床意义提出了质疑。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:60-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Consistent superiority of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors over placebo in reducing depressed mood in patients with major depression.在减轻重度抑郁症患者的抑郁情绪方面,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂持续优于安慰剂。
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;21(4):523-30. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.53. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
9
Presenting simulation results in a nested loop plot.在嵌套循环图中展示模拟结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 12;14:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-129.
10
Depression is not a consistent syndrome: An investigation of unique symptom patterns in the STAR*D study.抑郁症并非一种具有一致性的综合征:STAR*D研究中独特症状模式的调查。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

幕后的力量:一项评估可控设计因素对抗抑郁试验功效影响的临床试验模拟研究。

Power behind the throne: A clinical trial simulation study evaluating the impact of controllable design factors on the power of antidepressant trials.

机构信息

Inserm U1153 Team METHODS, University Paris Descartes, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.

Meta-research Innovation Center (METRICS), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Sep;28(3):e1779. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1779. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.1779
PMID:30997716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6877224/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of controllable design factors on the power of antidepressants trials.

METHODS

Using clinical trial simulation (CTS), we analyzed the combined impact on the power of trials of controllable design factors (sample size, outcome metrics, and disease severity at inclusion) and uncontrollable parameters (heterogeneity of diseases labeled "depression" in the source population and selective effects of drugs on items of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS], the most used outcome measurement tool). We elaborated 3,840 scenarios calibrated with real data, particularly the publication bias-corrected effect size.

RESULTS

For an effect size of 0.26, simulations revealed that in trials with ≤650 participants, power was less than 80%. Among the tested outcome metrics, the "remission" outcome provided more robustness for sample heterogeneity, whereas the continuous outcome "HDRS changes" provided more robustness when investigating drugs with a selective effect on the HDRS items. For the "remission" outcome, the power of trials increased with increasing HDRS threshold at inclusion but decreased with the outcomes "response" and "HDRS changes. Drugs with a selective effect on the HDRS items could not reach the same power as for the reference drug.

CONCLUSION

Our study allows for drawing recommendations to avoid underpowered trials of antidepressants.

摘要

目的

评估可控设计因素对抗抑郁药试验效力的影响。

方法

采用临床试验模拟(CTS),我们分析了可控设计因素(样本量、结局指标和纳入时疾病严重程度)和不可控参数(源人群中被标记为“抑郁”的疾病异质性以及药物对汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表[HDRS]项的选择性作用,这是最常用的结局测量工具)对试验效力的综合影响。我们详细阐述了 3840 个基于真实数据校准的情景,特别是发表偏倚校正的效应量。

结果

对于 0.26 的效应量,模拟显示,在≤650 名参与者的试验中,效力小于 80%。在测试的结局指标中,“缓解”结局对样本异质性提供了更高的稳健性,而“HDRS 变化”的连续结局在研究对 HDRS 项具有选择性作用的药物时提供了更高的稳健性。对于“缓解”结局,随着纳入时 HDRS 阈值的升高,试验的效力增加,但随着结局“反应”和“HDRS 变化”的增加而降低。对 HDRS 项具有选择性作用的药物无法达到与参比药物相同的效力。

结论

我们的研究可以为避免抗抑郁药试验效力不足提供建议。