Suppr超能文献

[骨科手法治疗与整骨疗法的比较分析:聚焦比利时情况]

[Comparative analysis between orthopaedic manual therapy and osteopathy : focus on the Belgian situation].

作者信息

Hidalgo B, Demoulin C

机构信息

Faculté des Sciences de la Motricité, UCLouvain.

Département des Sciences de la Motricité, Université de Liège (ULiege), Belgique.

出版信息

Rev Med Liege. 2019 Apr;74(4):204-211.

Abstract

Orthopaedic manual therapy (OMT) and osteopathy have been coexisting since a long time in Belgium to manage musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). There are millions of consultations per year in these both disciplines. Both of them offer good clinical outcomes as well as patient satisfaction with care, good cost-effectiveness, as well as minor side effects. Nevertheless, a major misunderstanding remains in Belgium concerning these both professions. A narrative review by Belgian experts in osteopathy and/or in OMT has been undertake. In Belgium, both professions present several major differences concerning the primary first care access, the recognition as health care profession, tailored reimbursement systems, types and organization of education, the use of rehabilitation and motor control, the integration of evidence based practice concept, the reasons/indications of consultation, the degree of confidence within the therapeutic touch concept. In the meantime, several similarities also exist including the integration of the bio-psycho-social model, the evaluation of the neuromusculoskeletal system and the treatment of MSDs using sometimes identical manual techniques, as well as the use of therapeutic education of the patient and specific clinical reasoning. This analysis may help health professionals, students and patients to better understand the convergences and divergences between these both disciplines of musculoskeletal care in Belgium.

摘要

在比利时,骨科手法治疗(OMT)和整骨疗法长期并存,用于管理肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)。这两个学科每年都有数百万次诊疗。它们都能带来良好的临床效果,患者对治疗满意度高,具有良好的成本效益,且副作用较小。然而,在比利时,人们对这两个专业仍存在重大误解。比利时整骨疗法和/或骨科手法治疗领域的专家进行了一项叙述性综述。在比利时,这两个专业在初级医疗保健的获取途径、作为医疗保健专业的认可度、定制的报销系统、教育类型和组织、康复和运动控制的使用、循证实践概念的整合、诊疗原因/适应症以及治疗性触摸概念中的信任程度等方面存在几个主要差异。同时,它们也存在一些相似之处,包括生物心理社会模型的整合、神经肌肉骨骼系统的评估、有时使用相同的手法技术治疗肌肉骨骼疾病,以及对患者进行治疗性教育和运用特定的临床推理。该分析可能有助于医疗专业人员、学生和患者更好地理解比利时这两个肌肉骨骼护理学科之间的异同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验