• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚基于共识的急诊护理临床研究重点。

Consensus-based clinical research priorities for emergency nursing in Australia.

作者信息

Considine Julie, Curtis Kate, Shaban Ramon Z, Fry Margaret

机构信息

Deakin University, Geelong: School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Eastern Health Partnership, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.

Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, Clinical Nurse Consultant - Emergency, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Australas Emerg Care. 2018 May;21(2):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.auec.2018.03.001
PMID:30998874
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research is vital to responding to contemporary challenges of providing safe, high quality emergency nursing care, yet the research priorities for emergency nursing practice in Australia are unknown. This study aimed to establish research priorities for emergency nursing in Australia.

METHODS

A two-stage descriptive, exploratory study was conducted. First, research themes were identified through a survey of 232 emergency nurses the Delphi Technique (2 rounds) was used to rank and prioritise the research themes.

RESULTS

There were five research themes with a CVI≥0.90: (i) recognising and responding to deteriorating ED patients; (ii) effect of access block on clinical care of admitted ICU patients; (iii) effects of ED overcrowding on clinical care; (iv) scope of practice of specialist emergency nurses; and (v) effect of access block on clinical care of admitted ward patients. These are reflected in four broad research priority areas: professional issues, patient safety, emergency care of vulnerable populations, and healthcare system issues.

CONCLUSION

Future research should focus on these priority areas in partnership with other emergency disciplines to enable safe, high quality emergency care, and, to inform the practice of emergency nursing in Australia.

摘要

引言

研究对于应对提供安全、高质量急诊护理的当代挑战至关重要,但澳大利亚急诊护理实践的研究重点尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定澳大利亚急诊护理的研究重点。

方法

进行了一项两阶段的描述性探索性研究。首先,通过对232名急诊护士的调查确定研究主题,采用德尔菲技术(两轮)对研究主题进行排序和优先排序。

结果

有五个内容效度指数(CVI)≥0.90的研究主题:(i)识别和应对急诊科病情恶化的患者;(ii)准入障碍对入住重症监护病房患者临床护理的影响;(iii)急诊科过度拥挤对临床护理的影响;(iv)专科急诊护士的执业范围;以及(v)准入障碍对入住病房患者临床护理的影响。这些体现在四个广泛的研究优先领域:专业问题、患者安全、弱势群体的急诊护理以及医疗系统问题。

结论

未来的研究应与其他急诊学科合作,聚焦于这些优先领域,以实现安全、高质量的急诊护理,并为澳大利亚的急诊护理实践提供参考。

相似文献

1
Consensus-based clinical research priorities for emergency nursing in Australia.澳大利亚基于共识的急诊护理临床研究重点。
Australas Emerg Care. 2018 May;21(2):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
So much to learn, so little time: educational priorities for the future of emergency nursing.要学的太多,时间却太少:急诊护理未来的教育重点。
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2009 Oct-Dec;31(4):337-53. doi: 10.1097/TME.0b013e3181bcb571.
3
ENA's Delphi study on national research priorities for emergency nurses in the United States.急诊护士协会(ENA)关于美国急诊护士国家研究重点的德尔菲研究。
J Emerg Nurs. 2004 Feb;30(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2003.10.009.
4
Nursing Research Priorities in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN): Reaching Consensus Through the Delphi Method.儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)中的护理研究重点:通过德尔菲法达成共识
J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Nov;45(6):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
5
A Delphi study on research priorities for emergency nurses in Western Australia.
J Emerg Nurs. 2004 Apr;30(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2004.01.005.
6
Practice expectations for Australian graduate emergency nursing programs: A Delphi study.澳大利亚研究生急诊护理项目的实践期望:德尔菲研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Apr;99:104811. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104811. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
7
Research directions for specialist practice.专科实践的研究方向。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000 Oct;8(4):214-22. doi: 10.1054/aaen.2000.0159.
8
A Delphi study on National PICU nursing research priorities in Australia and New Zealand.德尔菲法在澳大利亚和新西兰国家儿科重症监护护理研究重点中的应用。
Aust Crit Care. 2012 Feb;25(1):41-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
9
Consensus research priorities for paediatric status epilepticus: A Delphi study of health consumers, researchers and clinicians.儿童癫痫持续状态的共识研究重点:健康消费者、研究人员和临床医生的德尔菲研究。
Seizure. 2018 Mar;56:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
10
Research priorities in nursing--a Delphi study among Swedish nurses.护理领域的研究重点——一项针对瑞典护士的德尔菲研究
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2221-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02083.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol to establish standards for the elements of infection prevention and control programs and practice and competency standards for infection control professionals in Australian hospitals.澳大利亚医院感染预防与控制计划要素、感染控制专业人员实践及能力标准的制定协议。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0330221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330221. eCollection 2025.
2
Protocol to establish standards for the elements infection prevention and control programs and competencies for infection control professionals in Australian residential aged care homes.澳大利亚养老院感染预防与控制计划要素及感染控制专业人员能力标准制定协议。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 24;20(2):e0319108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319108. eCollection 2025.
3
Addressing Challenges to Enhance Clinical Research in Portugal: Insights from the OncoT3 Expert Group Delphi Study.
应对挑战以加强葡萄牙的临床研究:OncoT3专家小组德尔菲研究的见解
Cureus. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):e73720. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73720. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Fundamental care in the emergency room: insights from patients with life-threatening conditions in the emergency room.急诊基础护理:来自急诊有生命威胁状况患者的见解。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 17;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01133-4.
5
Nursing Sensitive Outcomes evaluation in the Emergency Department: An Umbrella Review.急诊科护理敏感结局评价:伞式综述。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2023 Nov;41(3). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v41n3e03.
6
The accuracy of the National Early Warning Score 2 in predicting early death in prehospital and emergency department settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.国家早期预警评分2在预测院前和急诊科环境中早期死亡方面的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jan 31;11(2):95. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6587.
7
Implementation evaluation of an evidence-based emergency nursing framework (HIRAID): study protocol for a step-wedge randomised control trial.基于证据的急诊护理框架(HIRAID)实施评估:一项阶梯式随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 17;13(1):e067022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067022.
8
Research priority setting in emergency care: A scoping review.急诊护理中的研究优先级设定:一项范围综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Dec 12;3(6):e12852. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12852. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Applying real-time Delphi methods: development of a pain management survey in emergency nursing.应用实时德尔菲法:急诊护理中疼痛管理调查的开展
BMC Nurs. 2021 Aug 18;20(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00661-9.
10
Systems for recognition and response to deteriorating emergency department patients: a scoping review.识别和应对急诊科病情恶化患者的系统:范围综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 May 22;29(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00882-6.