Suppr超能文献

2013 年至 2018 年期间,美国军人在役的头 24 个月内按军种划分的避孕措施使用和生育率:回顾性队列分析。

Contraceptive use and childbirth rates by service branch during the first 24 months on active duty in the United States military from 2013 to 2018: a retrospective cohort analysis.

机构信息

Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Medicine.

Division of Adolescent Medicine, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure the association of military branch-specific contraceptive education and access policy during basic training with contraceptive use and childbirth among new recruits.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of insurance records from 92,072 active duty servicewomen who started basic training between 2013 and 2017.

RESULTS

Exposure to reproductive health education and access to contraception during basic training differ by military branch. Highly effective contraception use (pills, patch, ring, shot, implants or intrauterine contraception) at 6 months on active duty [Army (18.1%), Air Force (27.4%), Marines (26.5%) and Navy (37.6%), p<.001], long-acting reversible contraceptive method use (implant or intrauterine) at 6 months [Army (2.0%), Air Force (3.7%), Marines (11.0%) and Navy (19.6%), p<.001] and childbirth in the first 24 months of service [Army (11.1%, 95% CI 10.7-11.5), Air Force (6.0%, 95% CI 5.6-6.4), Marines (8.4%, 95% CI 7.8-9.0) and Navy (6.7%, 95% CI 6.3-7.1)] varied by service branch. After adjusting for age at basic training and contraceptive use at 6 months on active duty, childbirth rates differed among all branches. The Army (hazard ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.71-2.01), Marines (1.48, 95% CI 1.33-1.65) and Navy (1.24, 95% CI 1.13-1.35) all had a higher risk of delivery than the Air Force.

CONCLUSION

Variation in branch-specific contraceptive education and access policy during basic training is associated with differences in rates of contraceptive use at 6 months on active duty and childbirth prior to 24 months on active duty. This occurs despite all recruits having access to an identical medical benefit including no-cost access to contraception after completing initial training. Further study is needed to determine the etiology of these differences.

IMPLICATIONS

Guidelines for contraceptive education and access during basic training, highly effective contraception use after 6 months of service and childbirth in the first 24 months of service vary among branches of the United States military. Reducing this variability may reduce childbirth rates and improve the reproductive health of junior enlisted servicewomen.

摘要

目的

衡量基础训练期间各军种特定避孕教育和获取政策与新兵避孕措施使用和生育的关联。

研究设计

对 2013 年至 2017 年间参加基础训练的 92072 名现役女兵的保险记录进行二次分析。

结果

基础训练期间的生殖健康教育和避孕获取因军种而异。现役 6 个月时高效避孕措施的使用率(避孕药、贴剂、环、针剂、植入物或宫内节育器)[陆军(18.1%)、空军(27.4%)、海军陆战队(26.5%)和海军(37.6%),p<.001]、长效可逆避孕方法的使用率(植入物或宫内节育器)[陆军(2.0%)、空军(3.7%)、海军陆战队(11.0%)和海军(19.6%),p<.001]和服役头 24 个月的生育率[陆军(11.1%,95%CI 10.7-11.5)、空军(6.0%,95%CI 5.6-6.4)、海军陆战队(8.4%,95%CI 7.8-9.0)和海军(6.7%,95%CI 6.3-7.1)]因军种而异。在校正基础训练时的年龄和现役 6 个月时的避孕措施使用情况后,所有分支的生育率均存在差异。与空军相比,陆军(风险比 1.86,95%CI 1.71-2.01)、海军陆战队(1.48,95%CI 1.33-1.65)和海军(1.24,95%CI 1.13-1.35)的分娩风险更高。

结论

基础训练期间各军种特定避孕教育和获取政策的差异与现役 6 个月时的避孕措施使用率和现役头 24 个月内的生育率差异相关。尽管所有新兵都可以获得相同的医疗福利,包括初始训练完成后免费获得避孕措施,但仍存在这种差异。需要进一步研究以确定这些差异的病因。

意义

美国各军种的基础训练期间避孕教育和获取指南、服务 6 个月后高效避孕措施的使用以及服役头 24 个月内的生育情况存在差异。减少这种变异性可能会降低生育率并改善初级入伍女兵的生殖健康。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验