Cognition, Ageing and Neurodegenerative Disease Lab, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.
University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Aug 5;368:111912. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111912. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Increasingly, it is being recognised that traumatic brain injury (TBI) is not just an acute event but instead results in ongoing neuronal injury that may lead to chronic impairments in multiple cognitive domains. Of these, deficits in executive function are one of the more common changes reported following TBI, and are a major predictor of well-being, social function and quality of life in individuals with a history of TBI. In order to fully understand the relationship between TBI and executive dysfunction, including brain mechanisms that may account for this, experimental models are clearly needed. However, to date, there have been a lack of preclinical studies systematically comparing the effect of injury severity on executive function, particularly at long-term timepoints post-injury. Furthermore, many previous studies have not used behavioural measures that are sensitive to the full range of executive function impairments that may manifest after injury, particularly in models of diffuse axonal injury (Lv et al.). The current study aimed to investigate the temporal profile, up to 12 months post-injury, of the evolution of executive dysfunction following different severities of injury in an experimental model of DAI. In order to do so, we utilised a rodent touchscreen paradigm to administer the 5 Choice- Continuous Performance Task (5C-CPT), an extension of the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRT). Interestingly, there were no differences in learning, motivation, attention, response time or impulsivity at 1 month, 6 months or 12 months post-injury in any of the TBI groups compared to sham, regardless of the initial severity of the injury. Instead, most of the effects on executive function seen at the 12 month timepoint appeared to be a result of ageing, not injury. As even the 12-month timepoint represents middle age in the rat, future studies will be needed to further probe these effects, in order to determine whether DAI may influence the presentation of executive dysfunction in older age.
越来越多的人认识到,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)不仅仅是一个急性事件,而是会导致持续的神经元损伤,从而导致多个认知领域的慢性损伤。在这些损伤中,执行功能缺陷是 TBI 后报告的更常见变化之一,也是 TBI 病史个体的幸福感、社会功能和生活质量的主要预测因素。为了充分了解 TBI 与执行功能障碍之间的关系,包括可能解释这种关系的大脑机制,显然需要实验模型。然而,迄今为止,缺乏系统比较损伤严重程度对执行功能影响的临床前研究,特别是在损伤后长期时间点。此外,许多以前的研究没有使用行为测量方法来测量损伤后可能表现出的全范围执行功能障碍,特别是在弥漫性轴索损伤(Lv 等人)模型中。本研究旨在研究实验性弥漫性轴索损伤模型中不同严重程度的损伤后,执行功能障碍的时间进程,直至损伤后 12 个月。为了做到这一点,我们利用啮齿动物触摸屏范式来执行 5 选择连续反应时间任务(5CSRT)的扩展,即 5 选择连续反应时间任务(5C-CPT)。有趣的是,与假手术组相比,无论初始损伤严重程度如何,在任何 TBI 组中,在 1 个月、6 个月或 12 个月后,学习、动机、注意力、反应时间或冲动性都没有差异。相反,在 12 个月时间点观察到的大多数执行功能障碍的影响似乎是衰老的结果,而不是损伤的结果。由于即使是 12 个月的时间点在大鼠中也代表中年,未来的研究将需要进一步探究这些影响,以确定弥漫性轴索损伤是否会影响老年时执行功能障碍的表现。