Suppr超能文献

节省库存 - 修订版:整个生命周期的心理计量学性能。

Saving inventory - Revised: Psychometric performance across the lifespan.

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Department of Psychology, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada.

University of British Columbia, Department of Psychology, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 1;252:358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Saving Inventory - Revised (SI-R) is the most widely used self-report measure of hoarding symptom severity. The goal of this study is to establish a firm empirical basis for a cutoff score on the SI-R and to examine the functioning of the SI-R as a screening tool and indicator of hoarding symptom severity across the lifespan.

METHODS

This study used archival data from 1,116 participants diagnosed with a clinical interview in 14 studies conducted by research groups who focus on hoarding. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the Youden's J statistic to determine optimal cutoff scores for classifying participants who would be likely to receive a hoarding diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall, the discriminant performance of the SI-R Total score and each of the three subscales was high, confirming the status of the SI-R is an excellent screening tool for differentiating hoarding from non-hoarding cases. The optimal SI-R Total cutoff score is 39, although analyses suggested that older adults require a significantly lower cutoff and adults younger than 40 years require a significantly higher cutoff score.

LIMITATIONS

The confidence interval around the optimal cutoff for the SI-R Total score for oldest age group was wide in comparison to those reported for the younger groups, creating more uncertainty around the optimal cutoff score for this group.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper provides investigators and clinicians with the data necessary to select evidence-based cutoff scores on the SI-R that optimally suit their relative need for sensitivity and specificity in different age groups.

摘要

背景

修订后的储蓄量表(SI-R)是最广泛使用的囤积症状严重程度的自我报告测量工具。本研究的目的是为 SI-R 的截断分数建立一个坚实的经验基础,并检验 SI-R 作为一种筛查工具和囤积症状严重程度的指标在整个生命周期中的作用。

方法

本研究使用了来自 14 项研究的 1116 名被诊断为临床访谈的参与者的档案数据,这些研究是由专注于囤积症的研究小组进行的。我们使用接收者操作特征(ROC)分析和 Youden's J 统计来确定最佳截断分数,以分类那些可能接受囤积症诊断的参与者。

结果

总的来说,SI-R 总分和三个分量表的辨别性能都很高,这证实了 SI-R 的状态是区分囤积症和非囤积症病例的极好的筛查工具。SI-R 总分的最佳截断分数是 39,尽管分析表明,老年人需要一个明显较低的截断分数,而 40 岁以下的成年人则需要一个明显较高的截断分数。

局限性

与年轻组报告的分数相比,SI-R 总分的最佳截断值的置信区间在最年长组中较宽,这使得该组的最佳截断值更加不确定。

结论

本文为研究人员和临床医生提供了必要的数据,以便根据不同年龄组的敏感性和特异性相对需求,选择基于证据的 SI-R 截断分数。

相似文献

1
Saving inventory - Revised: Psychometric performance across the lifespan.
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 1;252:358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
2
Psychometric Evaluation of the Saving Inventory-Revised in Older Adults.
Clin Gerontol. 2017 May-Jun;40(3):191-196. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2016.1267056. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
3
The UCLA Hoarding Severity Scale: development and validation.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Apr 1;175:488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.030. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
4
A latent factor approach to the Saving Inventory - Revised: Congeneric evaluation of construct and content validity.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Feb 15;323:689-697. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
A contemporary psychometric evaluation of the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R).
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):874-82. doi: 10.1037/pas0000075. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
9
Internet-based hoarding assessment: The reliability and predictive validity of the internet-based Hoarding Rating Scale, Self-Report.
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Dec;294:113505. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113505. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview.
J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2018 Jan;16:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Classification of hoarding and comorbid neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Psychiatry Res Commun. 2025 Jun;5(2). doi: 10.1016/j.psycom.2025.100215. Epub 2025 May 21.
3
Glutamatergic Medications for Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2452963. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52963.
4
5
Relationship of Hoarding and Depression Symptoms in Older Adults.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;32(4):497-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.11.006. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
6
Attention, response inhibition, and hoarding: A neuropsychological examination.
J Behav Addict. 2023 Sep 28;12(3):827-39. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00053.
8
Augmenting group hoarding disorder treatment with virtual reality discarding: A pilot study in older adults.
J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Oct;166:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
9
The experience of leaving a valuable object: An investigation of emotional processes related to Hoarding disorder features.
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 14;18(2):e0280933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280933. eCollection 2023.
10
Anosognosia in hoarding disorder is predicted by alterations in cognitive and inhibitory control.
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 16;12(1):21752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25532-4.

本文引用的文献

2
3
My possessions need me: Anthropomorphism and hoarding.
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Jun;59(3):340-348. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12441. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Psychometric Evaluation of the Saving Inventory-Revised in Older Adults.
Clin Gerontol. 2017 May-Jun;40(3):191-196. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2016.1267056. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
Age-Specific Prevalence of Hoarding and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Population-Based Study.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;25(3):245-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
Hoarding Symptoms Are Not Exclusive to Hoarders.
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 10;7:1742. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01742. eCollection 2016.
9
Age of onset and progression of hoarding symptoms in older adults with hoarding disorder.
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Jul;20(7):736-42. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1033684. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
10
Venlafaxine extended-release treatment of hoarding disorder.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Sep;29(5):266-73. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000036.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验