Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Department of Orthopaedic Research, Queensland University of Technology, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S297-S301. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.035. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Cement-in-cement femoral revision is a proven technique in revision total hip arthroplasty, with excellent results reported using standard-sized Exeter stems. The Exeter 44/00/125 short revision stem was introduced in 2004 to facilitate cement-in-cement revision. The stem is 25-mm shorter and has a slimmer body than standard stems to facilitate adjustment of depth of insertion and stem version. It is not known if this change in stem size affects its long-term performance. We therefore reviewed the outcome of all Exeter short revision stems used for cement-in-cement revision in our unit, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.
One hundred sixty-six cases were performed between 2004 and 2010. Mean follow-up of surviving patients was 8.1 years (range 5.0-11.7). The fate of all 166 hips were known and included in the survival analysis.
Median clinical scores improved significantly. Sixteen hips required re-revision (infection 6, loose cup 3, periprosthetic fracture 3, instability 2, stem fracture with chronic infection 1, and pain 1). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 10 years revealed 100% survival for aseptic stem loosening, 96.8% survival for stem failure, and 88.9% survival for all causes.
The Exeter short revision stem performed as well as standard length stems for cement-in-cement revision in this the largest and longest review of their use. Larger registry-based studies may provide additional information on the performance of this stem.
在翻修全髋关节置换术中,水泥-水泥股骨翻修是一种经过验证的技术,使用标准尺寸的 Exeter 柄可获得出色的结果。2004 年引入了 Exeter 44/00/125 短型翻修柄,以方便水泥-水泥翻修。该柄比标准柄短 25 毫米,且本体更细,可方便调整插入深度和柄的角度。但目前尚不清楚柄尺寸的这种变化是否会影响其长期性能。因此,我们回顾了在我院使用 Exeter 短型翻修柄进行水泥-水泥翻修的所有病例的结果,随访时间至少 5 年。
2004 年至 2010 年间共进行了 166 例手术。存活患者的平均随访时间为 8.1 年(5.0-11.7 年)。所有 166 髋的结局均已知,并纳入生存分析。
中位数临床评分显著改善。16 髋需要再次翻修(感染 6 髋,松动杯 3 髋,假体周围骨折 3 髋,不稳定 2 髋,柄骨折伴慢性感染 1 髋,疼痛 1 髋)。10 年 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示,无菌性柄松动的 100%生存率,柄失败的 96.8%生存率和所有原因的 88.9%生存率。
在这项 Exeter 短型翻修柄最大和最长的使用回顾中,该柄在水泥-水泥翻修中与标准长度柄的表现一样好。更大的基于注册的研究可能会提供有关该柄性能的更多信息。