Suppr超能文献

《水泥-水泥股骨翻修中的埃克塞特短翻修柄:五至十二年回顾》。

The Exeter Short Revision Stem for Cement-in-Cement Femoral Revision: A Five to Twelve Year Review.

机构信息

Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Department of Orthopaedic Research, Queensland University of Technology, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S297-S301. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.035. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cement-in-cement femoral revision is a proven technique in revision total hip arthroplasty, with excellent results reported using standard-sized Exeter stems. The Exeter 44/00/125 short revision stem was introduced in 2004 to facilitate cement-in-cement revision. The stem is 25-mm shorter and has a slimmer body than standard stems to facilitate adjustment of depth of insertion and stem version. It is not known if this change in stem size affects its long-term performance. We therefore reviewed the outcome of all Exeter short revision stems used for cement-in-cement revision in our unit, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.

METHOD

One hundred sixty-six cases were performed between 2004 and 2010. Mean follow-up of surviving patients was 8.1 years (range 5.0-11.7). The fate of all 166 hips were known and included in the survival analysis.

RESULTS

Median clinical scores improved significantly. Sixteen hips required re-revision (infection 6, loose cup 3, periprosthetic fracture 3, instability 2, stem fracture with chronic infection 1, and pain 1). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 10 years revealed 100% survival for aseptic stem loosening, 96.8% survival for stem failure, and 88.9% survival for all causes.

CONCLUSION

The Exeter short revision stem performed as well as standard length stems for cement-in-cement revision in this the largest and longest review of their use. Larger registry-based studies may provide additional information on the performance of this stem.

摘要

背景

在翻修全髋关节置换术中,水泥-水泥股骨翻修是一种经过验证的技术,使用标准尺寸的 Exeter 柄可获得出色的结果。2004 年引入了 Exeter 44/00/125 短型翻修柄,以方便水泥-水泥翻修。该柄比标准柄短 25 毫米,且本体更细,可方便调整插入深度和柄的角度。但目前尚不清楚柄尺寸的这种变化是否会影响其长期性能。因此,我们回顾了在我院使用 Exeter 短型翻修柄进行水泥-水泥翻修的所有病例的结果,随访时间至少 5 年。

方法

2004 年至 2010 年间共进行了 166 例手术。存活患者的平均随访时间为 8.1 年(5.0-11.7 年)。所有 166 髋的结局均已知,并纳入生存分析。

结果

中位数临床评分显著改善。16 髋需要再次翻修(感染 6 髋,松动杯 3 髋,假体周围骨折 3 髋,不稳定 2 髋,柄骨折伴慢性感染 1 髋,疼痛 1 髋)。10 年 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示,无菌性柄松动的 100%生存率,柄失败的 96.8%生存率和所有原因的 88.9%生存率。

结论

在这项 Exeter 短型翻修柄最大和最长的使用回顾中,该柄在水泥-水泥翻修中与标准长度柄的表现一样好。更大的基于注册的研究可能会提供有关该柄性能的更多信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验