Suppr超能文献

走跳板:一种用于研究安全语音的实验范式。

Walking the Plank: An Experimental Paradigm to Investigate Safety Voice.

作者信息

Noort Mark C, Reader Tom W, Gillespie Alex

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 2;10:668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00668. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The investigation of people raising or withholding safety concerns, termed safety voice, has relied on report-based methodologies, with few experiments. Generalisable findings have been limited because: the behavioural nature of safety voice is rarely operationalised; the reliance on memory and recall has well-established biases; and determining causality requires experimentation. Across three studies, we introduce, evaluate and make available the first experimental paradigm for studying safety voice: the "Walking the plank" paradigm. This paradigm presents participants with an apparent hazard (walking across a weak wooden plank) to elicit safety voice behaviours, and it addresses the methodological shortfalls of report-based methodologies. Study 1 ( = 129) demonstrated that the paradigm can elicit observable safety voice behaviours in a safe, controlled and randomised laboratory environment. Study 2 ( = 69) indicated it is possible to elicit safety silence for a single hazard when safety concerns are assessed and alternative ways to address the hazard are absent. Study 3 ( = 75) revealed that manipulating risk perceptions results in changes to safety voice behaviours. We propose a distinction between two independent dimensions (concerned-unconcerned and voice-silence) which yields a 2 × 2 safety voice typology. Demonstrating the need for experimental investigations of safety voice, the results found a consistent mismatch between self-reported and observed safety voice. The discussion examines insights on conceptualising and operationalising safety voice behaviours in relationship to safety concerns, and suggests new areas for research: replicating empirical studies, understanding the behavioural nature of safety voice, clarifying the personal relevance of physical harm, and integrating safety voice with other harm-prevention behaviours. Our article adds to the conceptual strength of the safety voice literature and provides a methodology and typology for experimentally examining people raising safety concerns.

摘要

对提出或隐瞒安全问题(即安全建言)的人员的调查一直依赖于基于报告的方法,实验较少。可推广的研究结果有限,原因如下:安全建言的行为本质很少被操作化;对记忆和回忆的依赖存在既定的偏差;确定因果关系需要进行实验。在三项研究中,我们引入、评估并提供了首个用于研究安全建言的实验范式:“走木板”范式。该范式向参与者呈现一种明显的危险(走过一块脆弱的木板),以引发安全建言行为,并且它解决了基于报告的方法在方法论上的不足。研究1(n = 129)表明,该范式能够在安全、可控且随机的实验室环境中引发可观察到的安全建言行为。研究2(n = 69)表明,当评估安全问题且不存在解决该危险的替代方法时,有可能针对单一危险引发安全沉默。研究3(n = 75)揭示,操纵风险认知会导致安全建言行为的改变。我们提出区分两个独立维度(关心 - 不关心和建言 - 沉默),这产生了一种2×2的安全建言类型学。结果发现自我报告的安全建言与观察到的安全建言之间始终存在不匹配,这表明需要对安全建言进行实验研究。讨论探讨了关于将安全建言行为与安全问题相关联进行概念化和操作化的见解,并提出了新的研究领域:重复实证研究、理解安全建言的行为本质、阐明身体伤害的个人相关性,以及将安全建言与其他伤害预防行为相结合。我们的文章增强了安全建言文献的概念力量,并为实验性地研究提出安全问题的人员提供了一种方法和类型学。

相似文献

1
Walking the Plank: An Experimental Paradigm to Investigate Safety Voice.
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 2;10:668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00668. eCollection 2019.
2
Sounds of silence: Data for analysing muted safety voice in speech.
Data Brief. 2021 May 30;37:107186. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107186. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Acting on voices: Omnipotence, sources of threat, and safety-seeking behaviours.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):201-13. doi: 10.1348/014466507X249093. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
6
The use of memory recall strategies in the management of behaviours associated with dementia.
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(7):207-230. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109070-00001.
7
Speaking up behaviours (safety voices) of healthcare workers: A metasynthesis of qualitative research studies.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Dec;64:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
The use of behavioural reinforcement in the management of behaviours of concern associated with dementia.
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(5):122-145. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109050-00001.
10
Safety-seeking behaviours and verbal auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia.
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.041. Epub 2014 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence Mechanism of Political Skill on Safety Voice Behavior in High-Risk Industries: The Mediating Role of Voice Efficacy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316162.
3
Sounds of silence: Data for analysing muted safety voice in speech.
Data Brief. 2021 May 30;37:107186. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107186. eCollection 2021 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Systematic Observation and Polar Coordinates Analysis to Assess Gender-Based Differences in Park Use in Barcelona.
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2299. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02299. eCollection 2018.
2
Culture, silence and voice: The implications for patient safety in the operating theatre.
J Perioper Pract. 2016 Dec;26(12):281-284. doi: 10.1177/175045891602601204.
3
Systematic Observation of an Expert Driver's Gaze Strategy-An On-Road Case Study.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 27;8:620. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00620. eCollection 2017.
6
Crucial Conversations: An interprofessional learning opportunity for senior healthcare students.
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):777-786. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1215971. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
7
Speaking up behaviours (safety voices) of healthcare workers: A metasynthesis of qualitative research studies.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Dec;64:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Rocking the boat - nursing students' stories of moral courage: A qualitative descriptive study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jul;42:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验