• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GnRH激动剂与hCG触发用于宫内人工授精诱导排卵的随机对照试验

GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Le Minh Tam, Nguyen Dac Nguyen, Zolton Jessica, Nguyen Vu Quoc Huy, Truong Quang Vinh, Cao Ngoc Thanh, Decherney Alan, Hill Micah J

机构信息

Department of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, Vietnam.

Department of OBGYN, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int J Endocrinol. 2019 Mar 13;2019:2487067. doi: 10.1155/2019/2487067. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/2487067
PMID:31001335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6436329/
Abstract

This study is aimed at comparing clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in patients who are administered either gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. A total of 197 infertile women were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger ( = 98 cycles) or hCG trigger ( = 99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation. A clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity. There was no difference in ovulation rates in either group receiving GnRHa or hCG trigger for ovulation. Biochemical and CPR were higher in patients who received hCG (28.3% and 23.2%) versus GnRHa (14.3% and 13.3%) ( = 0.023, OR 0.42, 95%CI = 0.21 - 0.86 and = 0.096, OR 0.51, 95%CI = 0.24 - 1.07, respectively). After adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and infertility duration, there was no difference in CPR between the two groups (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.27-1.25, = 0.163). In conclusion, the use of the GnRHa to trigger ovulation in patients undergoing ovulation induction may be considered in patients treated with IUI.

摘要

本研究旨在比较在宫内人工授精(IUI)周期中,接受促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)或人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)进行排卵触发的患者的临床妊娠率(CPR)。在越南顺化大学医院进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究。共有197名不孕女性被随机分配接受GnRHa触发(98个周期)或hCG触发(99个周期)进行排卵触发。患者在IUI后24小时返回进行超声监测以确认排卵。临床妊娠定义为存在带有胎心活动的妊娠囊。接受GnRHa或hCG触发排卵的两组患者的排卵率没有差异。接受hCG的患者(28.3%和23.2%)的生化妊娠率和临床妊娠率高于接受GnRHa的患者(14.3%和13.3%)(P = 0.023,OR 0.42,95%CI = 0.21 - 0.86;P = 0.096,OR 0.51,95%CI = 0.24 - 1.07)。在调整体重指数(BMI)和不孕持续时间后,两组之间的临床妊娠率没有差异(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.27 - 1.25,P = 0.163)。总之,在接受IUI治疗的患者中,对于接受排卵诱导的患者,可考虑使用GnRHa触发排卵。

相似文献

1
GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial.GnRH激动剂与hCG触发用于宫内人工授精诱导排卵的随机对照试验
Int J Endocrinol. 2019 Mar 13;2019:2487067. doi: 10.1155/2019/2487067. eCollection 2019.
2
The effect of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotrophin trigger on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in Letrozole-HMG IUI cycles.来曲唑-人绒毛膜促性腺激素方案中促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素扳机对妊娠及新生儿结局的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05835-8.
3
To Compare the Effect of GnRH Agonist versus Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) Trigger on Clinical Pregnancy Rate in Intrauterine Insemination Cycle.比较促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)扳机对宫腔内人工授精周期临床妊娠率的影响。
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):267-272. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_100_20. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Efficacy of GnRH agonist trigger in women having history of follicular-endometrial asynchrony with clomiphene/IUI cycles in unexplained infertility.枸橼酸氯米酚/宫腔内人工授精周期中存在卵泡-子宫内膜不同步史的不明原因不孕患者应用 GnRH 激动剂扳机的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):427-432. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4834-1. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Does intrauterine insemination timing matter for achieving pregnancy during ovulation induction using gonadotropins? A retrospective cohort study.促性腺激素诱导排卵时宫腔内人工授精时机对妊娠结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Jun;80(6):366-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients.根据卵巢对刺激的反应进行 GnRHa 触发和个体化黄体期 hCG 支持:IVF 患者的两项前瞻性随机对照多中心研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2511-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det249. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
7
[The effect of three trigger methodson pregnancy outcome of intrauterine insemination].[三种触发方法对宫腔内人工授精妊娠结局的影响]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 3;99(33):2602-2605. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.33.009.
8
DUAL TRIGGER STRATEGY AFTER CONTROLLED STIMULATION INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION CYCLE DID NOT INFLUENCE THE PREGNANCY OUTCOME COMPARED WITH STANDARD HCG TRIGGER ONLY PROTOCOL.宫腔内人工授精周期中控制性刺激后采用双重触发策略与仅采用标准 hCG 触发方案比较并不影响妊娠结局。
Wiad Lek. 2022;75(5 pt 2):1268-1273. doi: 10.36740/WLek202205207.
9
Spontaneous triggering of ovulation versus HCG administration in patients undergoing IUI: a prospective randomized study.在接受 IUI 的患者中,自发排卵与 HCG 给药的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Sep;25(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 May 23.
10
Low dose human chorionic gonadotropin administration at the time of gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist trigger versus 35 h later in women at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome - a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial.在人绒毛膜促性腺激素释放激素激动剂扳机时给予低剂量人绒毛膜促性腺激素与在有发生卵巢过度刺激综合征高危风险的妇女中在 35 小时后给予相比 - 一项前瞻性随机双盲临床试验。
J Ovarian Res. 2019 Jan 26;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0483-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of uterine flushing with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on pregnancy rates in primary unexplained infertility: a randomized controlled trial.人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)子宫灌注对原发性不明原因不孕症妊娠率的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02242-3.
2
Optimizing intrauterine insemination: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of clinical treatment add-ons.优化宫腔内人工授精:临床治疗附加物有效性和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Oct;103(10):1919-1932. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14858. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
3
The effect of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotrophin trigger on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in Letrozole-HMG IUI cycles.来曲唑-人绒毛膜促性腺激素方案中促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素扳机对妊娠及新生儿结局的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05835-8.
4
Comparison of the predictive capability of antral follicle count vs. the anti-Müllerian hormone for ovarian response in infertile women.窦卵泡计数与抗苗勒管激素对不孕妇女卵巢反应预测能力的比较。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 31;13:862733. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.862733. eCollection 2022.
5
Association Between Type of Infertility and Live Birth in Couples With a Single Intrauterine Insemination Resulting in Pregnancy: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.不孕类型与单次宫腔内人工授精妊娠结局活产的关系:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 14;13:926183. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.926183. eCollection 2022.
6
History of infertility and pregnancy outcomes in Project Viva: a prospective study.Viva 项目中不孕史和妊娠结局:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04885-8.
7
Dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin improves the outcome of intrauterine insemination.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与重组人绒毛膜促性腺激素双重触发可改善宫腔内人工授精的结局。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Mar;65(2):207-214. doi: 10.5468/ogs.21275. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
8
Evaluation of Protocols of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Obtaining Mature Oocytes (MII): Retrospective Study on Assisted Reproductive Technology Procedures.控制性卵巢刺激方案在获得成熟卵母细胞(MII)中的评估:辅助生殖技术程序的回顾性研究。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Aug 4;26(3):387-397. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210077.
9
To Compare the Effect of GnRH Agonist versus Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) Trigger on Clinical Pregnancy Rate in Intrauterine Insemination Cycle.比较促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)扳机对宫腔内人工授精周期临床妊娠率的影响。
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):267-272. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_100_20. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards an optimal luteal support modality in agonist triggered cycles: a randomized clinical trial.在激动剂触发周期中寻求最佳黄体支持方式:一项随机临床试验。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Jun 1;33(6):1079-1086. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey054.
2
Comparing the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin on final oocytes for ovulation triggering among infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination: An RCT.比较促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与人绒毛膜促性腺激素对接受宫内人工授精的不孕女性最终用于排卵触发的卵母细胞的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017 Jun;15(6):351-356.
3
Triggering final follicular maturation: hCG, GnRH-agonist, or both, when and to whom?触发卵泡最终成熟:人绒毛膜促性腺激素、促性腺激素释放激素激动剂,或两者并用,何时使用及用于何人?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Sep;34(9):1231-1232. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0982-7. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
4
GnRH Agonist Trigger and LH Activity Luteal Phase Support versus hCG Trigger and Conventional Luteal Phase Support in Fresh Embryo Transfer IVF/ICSI Cycles-A Systematic PRISMA Review and Meta-analysis.GnRH激动剂触发与LH活性黄体期支持对比hCG触发与传统黄体期支持用于新鲜胚胎移植体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期——一项PRISMA系统评价与Meta分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 7;8:116. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00116. eCollection 2017.
5
Progesterone luteal support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.排卵诱导及宫内人工授精后的黄体酮黄体支持:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):924-933.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
6
Which is the best intrauterine insemination timing choice following exogenous hCG administration during ovulation induction by using clomiphene citrate treatment? A retrospective study.在使用枸橼酸氯米芬治疗诱导排卵过程中外源性人绒毛膜促性腺激素给药后,最佳的宫腔内人工授精时机选择是什么?一项回顾性研究。
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 9;5(1):1307. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2992-9. eCollection 2016.
7
Current clinical irrelevance of luteal phase deficiency: a committee opinion.黄体功能不足的临床相关性现状:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Apr;103(4):e27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.128. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
8
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology.在拮抗剂辅助生殖技术中,促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素用于卵母细胞触发的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;2014(10):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4.
9
The evaluation of pre and post processing semen analysis parameters at the time of intrauterine insemination in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility and pregnancy rates based on stimulation agent. A retrospective cohort study.对诊断为男性因素不育的夫妇进行宫内授精时精液分析参数的前后处理评估以及基于刺激剂的妊娠率。一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug;179:159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 20.
10
Elevated day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone in younger women: is gonadotropin stimulation/intrauterine insemination a good option?年轻女性第三天卵泡刺激素升高:促性腺激素刺激/宫内人工授精是一个好选择吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):62.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Jan 29.