Berhane Defaye Frehiwot, Danis Marion, Wakim Paul, Berhane Yemane, Norheim Ole Frithjof, Miljeteig Ingrid
a Research Group in Global Health Priorities, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Norway.
b Center for Medical Ethics and Priority Setting , Addis Ababa University , Ethiopia.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):125-135. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1583691. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
In low-income settings resource constraints force clinicians to make harsh choices. We examine the criteria Ethiopian physicians use in their bedside rationing decisions through a national survey at 49 public hospitals in Ethiopia. Substantial variation in weight given to different criteria were reported by the 587 participating physicians (response rate 91.7%). Young age, primary prevention, or the patient being the family's economic provider increased likelihood of offering treatment to a patient, while small expected benefit or low chance of success diminished likelihood. More than 50% of responding physicians were indifferent to patient's position in society, unhealthy behavior, and residence, while they varied widely in weight they gave to patient's poverty, ability to work, and old age. While the majority of Ethiopian physicians reported allocation of resources that was compatible with national priorities, more contested criteria were also frequently reported. This might affect distributional justice and equity in health care access.
在低收入环境中,资源限制迫使临床医生做出艰难抉择。我们通过对埃塞俄比亚49家公立医院进行的全国性调查,研究了埃塞俄比亚医生在床边资源分配决策中所使用的标准。587名参与调查的医生(回应率91.7%)报告称,他们在不同标准上所赋予的权重存在很大差异。年轻、一级预防或患者是家庭的经济支柱会增加为患者提供治疗的可能性,而预期收益小或成功几率低则会降低这种可能性。超过50%的回应医生对患者的社会地位、不健康行为和居住地漠不关心,而他们在赋予患者贫困、工作能力和年龄的权重上差异很大。虽然大多数埃塞俄比亚医生报告称资源分配与国家优先事项相符,但也经常报告一些更具争议性的标准。这可能会影响医疗保健获取方面的分配公平和公正。