Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 19;14(4):e0215480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215480. eCollection 2019.
The availability of antibiotics presents medical practitioners with a prescribing dilemma. On the one hand, antibiotics provide a safe and effective treatment option for patients with bacterial infections, but at a population level, over-prescription reduces their effectiveness by facilitating the evolution of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotic medication. A game-theoretic investigation, including analysis of equilibrium strategies, evolutionarily stability, and replicator dynamics, reveals that rational doctors, motivated to attain the best outcomes for their own patients, will prescribe antibiotics irrespective of the level of antibiotic resistance in the population and the behavior of other doctors, although they would achieve better long-term outcomes if their prescribing were more restrained. Ever-increasing antibiotic resistance may therefore be inevitable unless some means are found of modifying the payoffs of this potentially catastrophic social dilemma.
抗生素的存在给医疗从业者带来了一个处方上的两难困境。一方面,抗生素为患有细菌感染的患者提供了安全有效的治疗选择,但从人群层面来看,过度处方会通过促进对抗生素药物产生耐药性的细菌进化,从而降低抗生素的有效性。博弈论的研究,包括对均衡策略、进化稳定性和复制者动态的分析,揭示了理性的医生,出于为自己的患者获得最佳治疗效果的动机,无论人群中抗生素耐药性的水平如何,也无论其他医生的行为如何,他们都会开抗生素,尽管如果他们的处方更有节制,他们会获得更好的长期效果。除非找到某种方法来改变这种潜在灾难性的社会困境的收益,否则抗生素耐药性的不断增加可能是不可避免的。