Research Institute for Pesticides and Water, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain.
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liège, Belgium; Hematology and Hemotherapy group, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019 Jul 15;171:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
A Liquid Chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based method have been developed for the determination of the main estrogen compounds -estrone (E1) and 17β-estradiol (E2)- in human serum. Two isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) quantification procedures have been used: a classical calibration curve-based method were compared to a recently developed isotope pattern deconvolution (IPD) method. IPD is based on isotopic abundance measurements and multiple linear regression. Validation was performed in terms of intra-assay repeatability (n = 5), inter-assay reproducibility (n = 9) and accuracy using spiked steroid-free serum at 5 concentration levels and 3 certified reference materials. Both methodologies meet EMEA requirements yielding recoveries between 79-106% and coefficient of variations of 1.7-8.3% along all experiments. Limits of quantification as low as 5 ng/L were achieved. 40 real samples were analysed for comparison purposes showing a great correlation between calibration and IPD concentration values. Real samples were also quantified by routine immunoassay analysis, which showed a significant proportional bias of 2.55 for E1 and good correlation for E2. While methods were considered suitable for routine or countercheck analysis within the context of hospital's needs, IPD has demonstrated to be faster and cost saving.
建立了一种基于液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)的方法,用于测定人血清中的主要雌激素化合物-雌酮(E1)和 17β-雌二醇(E2)。采用了两种同位素稀释质谱(IDMS)定量程序:一种是基于经典校准曲线的方法,与最近开发的同位素峰形解卷积(IPD)方法进行了比较。IPD 基于同位素丰度测量和多元线性回归。通过在 5 个浓度水平和 3 个认证参考物质上使用加标无类固醇血清进行日内重复性(n=5)、日间重现性(n=9)和准确性验证来进行验证。两种方法均符合 EMEA 的要求,回收率在 79-106%之间,所有实验的变异系数为 1.7-8.3%。定量限低至 5ng/L。为了比较目的分析了 40 个实际样品,结果表明校准和 IPD 浓度值之间具有很好的相关性。实际样品也通过常规免疫分析进行了定量分析,结果表明 E1 存在显著的比例偏差(2.55),E2 相关性良好。虽然这些方法被认为适合于医院需求范围内的常规或复核分析,但 IPD 已被证明更快且更具成本效益。