• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[林奇综合征的预防性子宫切除术:可行性与结果]

[Prophylactic hysterectomy in Lynch syndrome: Feasibility and outcomes].

作者信息

Pacelli J, Gosset M, Rossi L, Ngo C, Delomenie M, Nos C, Lécuru F, Bats A-S

机构信息

Chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du sein, hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France; Inserm UMR-S 747, université Paris-Descartes, 75015 Paris, France.

Chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du sein, hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France; Faculté de Médecine, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, université Paris-Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019 Jun;47(6):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2019.04.010
PMID:31003015
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary predisposition to cancers, first of all, colo-rectal and endometrial cancers in women. Although recommended, gynecologic screening has never proven its benefit. Prophylactic surgery can be considered once the parental project is completed. There are few data regarding the assessment of prophylactic surgery. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the feasibility and morbidity of prophylactic hysterectomy in patients with Lynch syndrome.

METHODS

This is a descriptive retrospective study of consecutive patients with LS undergoing prophylactic hysterectomy at the Georges-Pompidou European Hospital from 2002 to 2016. We collected demographic characteristics, results of preoperative assessment, intra- and postoperative data, final pathologic result as well as postoperative follow-up data.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the study, and seventeen women had a history of colon cancer surgery. All hysterectomies were performed by laparoscopy, with two cases of laparoconversion. Two intraoperative complications occurred: serosal small bowel injuries and superficial bladder injury. Two early postoperative complications occurred (a peritonitis on small bowel perforation and a peritonitis on left ureteral injury) and two late complications (vesico-vaginal fistula and adhesive small bowel obstruction). All operative specimens were benign. With a median follow-up of 28 months [5-52], no patient had peritoneal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that prophylactic hysterectomy in Lynch syndrome should be done with caution. Per and postoperative complication rates appear to be higher than in general population, probably related to a more frequent history of colorectal cancer. However, total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy appears to be an effective strategy for preventing gynecological cancers in women with the Lynch syndrome.

摘要

目的

林奇综合征(LS)是一种癌症遗传易感性疾病,首先是女性的结直肠癌和子宫内膜癌。尽管有推荐,但妇科筛查从未证明其益处。一旦完成生育计划,可考虑进行预防性手术。关于预防性手术评估的数据很少。我们研究的目的是评估林奇综合征患者预防性子宫切除术的可行性和发病率。

方法

这是一项对2002年至2016年在乔治·蓬皮杜欧洲医院接受预防性子宫切除术的连续LS患者进行的描述性回顾性研究。我们收集了人口统计学特征、术前评估结果、术中和术后数据、最终病理结果以及术后随访数据。

结果

40例患者纳入研究,17名女性有结肠癌手术史。所有子宫切除术均通过腹腔镜进行,2例中转开腹。术中发生2例并发症:浆膜层小肠损伤和膀胱浅表损伤。术后发生2例早期并发症(小肠穿孔引起的腹膜炎和左输尿管损伤引起的腹膜炎)和2例晚期并发症(膀胱阴道瘘和粘连性小肠梗阻)。所有手术标本均为良性。中位随访28个月[5 - 52个月],无患者发生腹膜癌。

结论

我们的研究表明,林奇综合征患者进行预防性子宫切除术应谨慎。围手术期和术后并发症发生率似乎高于普通人群,可能与结直肠癌病史更常见有关。然而,全子宫切除加双侧输卵管卵巢切除术似乎是预防林奇综合征女性妇科癌症的有效策略。

相似文献

1
[Prophylactic hysterectomy in Lynch syndrome: Feasibility and outcomes].[林奇综合征的预防性子宫切除术:可行性与结果]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019 Jun;47(6):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
2
Prophylactic surgery to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancers in the Lynch syndrome.预防性手术以降低林奇综合征患者患妇科癌症的风险。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 19;354(3):261-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052627.
3
The gynecological surveillance of women with Lynch syndrome in Sweden.瑞典林奇综合征女性的妇科监测
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):717-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Jul 12.
4
Discovery of an endometrioid cancer lymph node metastasis without primary tumor in a context of Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征背景下无原发性肿瘤的子宫内膜样癌淋巴结转移的发现。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Mar;50(3):102060. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102060. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Prophylactic Risk-reducing Hysterectomies and Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomies in Patients With Lynch Syndrome: A Clinicopathologic Study of 29 Cases and Review of the Literature.林奇综合征患者的预防性风险降低子宫切除术和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术:29 例临床病理研究及文献复习。
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2020 Jul;39(4):313-320. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000643.
6
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
7
Quality of life following prophylactic gynecological surgery: experiences of female Lynch mutation carriers.预防性妇科手术后的生活质量:林奇突变女性携带者的经历
Fam Cancer. 2018 Jan;17(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-9997-6.
8
Short- and long-term outcomes for single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy for women at risk for gynecologic cancer.单孔腹腔镜下保留生育功能的输卵管-卵巢切除术联合或不联合子宫切除术用于妇科癌症高危女性的近期和远期结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Feb;31(2):215-221. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001405. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Prevalence of occult gynecologic malignancy at the time of risk reducing and nonprophylactic surgery in patients with Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征患者行风险降低和非预防性手术时隐匿性妇科恶性肿瘤的发生率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Feb;132(2):434-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.033. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
[Colorectal Carcinoma with Suspected Lynch Syndrome: A Multidisciplinary Algorithm].[疑似林奇综合征的结直肠癌:多学科诊疗方案]
Zentralbl Chir. 2015 Dec;140(6):591-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368480. Epub 2014 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk-Reducing Gynecological Surgery in Lynch Syndrome: Results of an International Survey from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database.林奇综合征的降低风险妇科手术:来自前瞻性林奇综合征数据库的国际调查结果
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 18;9(7):2290. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072290.