• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新一代药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在静脉桥中的应用-基于倾向评分匹配的 1 年结果(SVG Baltic 注册研究)。

New-generation drug eluting stent vs. bare metal stent in saphenous vein graft - 1 year outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment (SVG Baltic Registry).

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; SIRIO MEDICINE research network, Italy.

First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;292:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.022
PMID:31003797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the efficacy of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-designed drug-eluting stent (new-DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) stenosis is scarce. The primary objective was to compare one-year clinical outcomes of PCI in stenosis of SVG using new-DES vs. BMS in a real-world population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We carried out a multi-center registry comparing new-DES with BMS in all consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The primary composite endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year. This observation included 792 consecutive patients (mean age 69 ± 8.9y), treated with either new-DES (n = 379, 47.9%) or BMS (n = 413, 52.1%). Among patients treated with new-DES compared with BMS, there was a lower risk of MACCE (21.4% vs. 28.3%, HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p = 0.025) as well as myocardial infarction (MI) (6.3% vs. 12.1%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.82, p = 0.005) at 1 year. After propensity score adjustment, the similar, significant reduction in MACCE and MI was observed in favor of new-DES (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.030; and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.92, p = 0.020, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing PCI of SVG, the use of new-DES is associated with a reduced 1-year rate of MACCE and MI compared to BMS.

摘要

背景

关于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中新型药物洗脱支架(new-DES)与裸金属支架(BMS)治疗静脉桥血管(SVG)狭窄的疗效数据较少。主要目的是比较真实世界人群中使用新型 DES 和 BMS 治疗 SVG 狭窄的 PCI 患者一年的临床结局。

方法和结果

我们进行了一项多中心注册研究,比较了所有接受 SVG-PCI 的连续患者中新型 DES 和 BMS 的使用情况。主要复合终点是 1 年时的主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCE)。该观察包括 792 例连续患者(平均年龄 69±8.9 岁),分别接受新型 DES(n=379,47.9%)或 BMS(n=413,52.1%)治疗。与 BMS 相比,接受新型 DES 治疗的患者 MACCE(21.4%比 28.3%,HR=0.69,95%CI 0.50-0.95,p=0.025)和心肌梗死(MI)(6.3%比 12.1%,HR 0.49,95%CI 0.30-0.82,p=0.005)的风险较低。经过倾向评分调整后,新型 DES 治疗在 MACCE 和 MI 方面仍有明显降低(HR 0.66,95%CI 0.46-0.96,p=0.030;HR 0.53,95%CI 0.31-0.92,p=0.020)。

结论

在接受 SVG-PCI 的患者中,与 BMS 相比,使用新型 DES 可降低 1 年时 MACCE 和 MI 的发生率。

相似文献

1
New-generation drug eluting stent vs. bare metal stent in saphenous vein graft - 1 year outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment (SVG Baltic Registry).新一代药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在静脉桥中的应用-基于倾向评分匹配的 1 年结果(SVG Baltic 注册研究)。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;292:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
In-hospital and 1-year outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention: a report from the EVENT registry.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的院内和 1 年预后:来自 EVENT 注册研究的报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec 1;80(7):1127-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24352. Epub 2012 May 4.
3
Safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein bypass graft percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the Veterans Affairs CART program.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在隐静脉旁路移植经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的安全性和有效性:来自退伍军人事务 CART 计划的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 28;64(17):1825-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1207. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
4
Drug eluting versus bare metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein graft lesions: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于隐静脉桥病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Oct-Nov;19(7 Pt B):837-844. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
Long-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft lesions: from Western Denmark Heart Registry.与裸金属支架相比,药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗隐静脉桥病变的长期预后:来自丹麦西部心脏注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):1035-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25279. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
6
Outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention results from the STENT (strategic transcatheter evaluation of new therapies) group.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的结果来自 STENT(新疗法的策略性经导管评估)研究组。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.020.
7
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.大隐静脉移植血管介入治疗中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较:随机试验的最新综合荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
8
Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in saphenous vein graft interventions. Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在隐静脉移植血管介入治疗中的长期疗效。一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析证据。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Dec;19(8):951-955. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
9
Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft disease: results from the Prairie "Real World" Stent Registry.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在静脉桥病变中的长期疗效:Prairie“真实世界”支架注册研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):93-100. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22194.
10
Choice of Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Saphenous Vein Grafts.用于隐静脉桥血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的支架选择
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004457.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term outcomes of drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for saphenous vein graft lesions in coronary heart disease.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗冠心病大隐静脉桥病变的短期疗效
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 6;10:982880. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.982880. eCollection 2023.
2
Five-Year Comparative Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting vs. Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.依维莫司洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的五年疗效比较
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 19;10(6):1278. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061278.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Embolic Protection Devices in Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions: A Propensity Score Analysis-Multicenter SVG PCI PROTECTA Study.
隐静脉搭桥介入治疗中栓子保护装置的安全性和有效性:一项倾向评分分析 - 多中心SVG PCI PROTECTA研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 22;9(4):1198. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041198.