Krause Stephan, Lacana Emanuela, Welch Joel, Shapiro Marjorie, Downey Christopher, Chung Jee, Zhou Qing, Van Der Plas Martijn, Depatie Chantal, Ingram Bev, Srebalus-Barnes Catherine, Polozova Alla, Rellahan Barbara, Choi Daeseok, Burdick Richard, Stangler Thomas, Shacter Emily
AstraZeneca Biologics, 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD 20878;
CDER, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2019 Jul-Aug;73(4):401-416. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2019.010215. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
This workshop report summarizes the presentations, the breakout session outcomes, and the speaker panel discussions from the PDA Biosimilars Workshop held September 27-28, 2018, in Washington, DC. This format was deliberately selected for the workshop with the expectation of delivering a post-workshop paper on current best practices and existing challenges for sponsors. The event, co-chaired by Dr. Stephan Krause (AstraZeneca Biologics) and Dr. Emanuela Lacana (CDER/FDA), was attended by 140 agency and industry representatives. The workshop was separated into three major sessions P1: Regulatory Perspective, P2: Challenges in Biosimilar Development, and P3: Demonstrating Analytical Similarity. Each of the three sessions started with agency and industry presentations. Participants then split into two concurrent roundtable discussion groups to hear the answers to questions that had been provided to all participants one week prior to the event. The sessions were recorded. This paper provides consolidated answers to specific case studies for current challenges to sponsors and agencies. In addition, the panel discussion notes following each breakout roundtable session, as well as brief talk summaries of all speakers, are provided. The first session explored the challenges encountered with submission of biosimilar marketing applications from the perspectives of regulatory agencies. Expectations for a successful submission of the chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) information were described. The second session addressed high-level technical challenges and how to avoid pitfalls frequently encountered during biosimilar candidate development, including data quality expectations, creation of the final control strategy, and strategic choices necessary for candidate selection and development. Both regulatory perspectives and industry experience were shared. The last session explored the use of statistical tools to provide meaningful contributions to the demonstration of analytical similarity. The presentations highlighted common issues and practical challenges that arise during the application of statistical tools. Significant challenges are still-remaining for sponsors and agencies to successfully develop and license Biosimilars. A Biosimilars Workshop was therefore held on 27-28 September 2018 in Washington, DC, to find practical solutions to the remaining challenges. The workshop planning committee with members from industry and agencies prepared specific case studies focused on some of most difficult situations. The workshop was separated into three major sessions (P1 - Regulatory Perspective; P2 - Challenges in Biosimilar Development; P3 - Demonstrating Analytical Similarity) and each session attempted to provide practical solutions to the relevant case studies. This first session explored the challenges encountered with submission of biosimilar marketing applications from the regulatory agencies' perspectives. Expectations for a successful submission of the CMC information were described. The second session addressed high-level technical challenges frequently encountered during biosimilar candidate development, including data quality expectations, the creation of the final control strategy, and strategic choices necessary for candidate selection and development. The last session explored the use of statistical tools to provide meaningful contributions to the demonstration of analytical similarity and practical challenges that arise during the application of statistical tools.
本研讨会报告总结了2018年9月27日至28日在华盛顿特区举行的PDA生物类似药研讨会上的演讲内容、分组讨论结果以及专家小组讨论情况。特意为本次研讨会选择这种形式,期望能就赞助商当前的最佳实践和现存挑战发表一篇会后论文。该活动由斯特凡·克劳斯博士(阿斯利康生物制品公司)和埃玛努埃拉·拉卡纳博士(药品评估和研究中心/美国食品药品监督管理局)共同主持,140名机构和行业代表出席了会议。研讨会分为三个主要部分:P1:监管视角;P2:生物类似药开发中的挑战;P3:证明分析相似性。这三个部分均以机构和行业的演讲开场。然后,参与者分成两个并行的圆桌讨论小组,听取对活动前一周提供给所有参与者的问题的解答。会议进行了记录。本文针对赞助商和机构当前面临的挑战,提供了对特定案例研究的综合解答。此外,还提供了每个分组圆桌会议之后的小组讨论记录,以及所有演讲者的简要发言总结。第一部分从监管机构的角度探讨了提交生物类似药上市申请时遇到的挑战。阐述了成功提交化学、生产和控制(CMC)信息的期望。第二部分讨论了生物类似药候选药物开发过程中经常遇到的高层次技术挑战,包括对数据质量的期望、最终控制策略的制定,以及候选药物选择和开发所需的战略选择。分享了监管视角和行业经验。最后一部分探讨了使用统计工具为证明分析相似性做出有意义贡献的情况,以及应用统计工具过程中出现的实际挑战。对于赞助商和机构而言,成功开发生物类似药并获得许可仍面临重大挑战。因此,2018年9月27日至28日在华盛顿特区举行了一次生物类似药研讨会,以寻找应对剩余挑战的实际解决方案。研讨会规划委员会由来自行业和机构的成员组成,他们准备了专注于一些最困难情况的特定案例研究。研讨会分为三个主要部分(P1 - 监管视角;P2 - 生物类似药开发中的挑战;P3 - 证明分析相似性),每个部分都试图为相关案例研究提供实际解决方案。第一部分从监管机构的角度探讨了提交生物类似药上市申请时遇到的挑战。阐述了成功提交CMC信息的期望。第二部分讨论了生物类似药候选药物开发过程中经常遇到的高层次技术挑战,包括对数据质量的期望、最终控制策略的制定,以及候选药物选择和开发所需的战略选择。最后一部分探讨了使用统计工具为证明分析相似性做出有意义贡献的情况,以及应用统计工具过程中出现的实际挑战。