Suppr超能文献

生物类似药:关键监管考量因素及相似性评估工具

Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools.

作者信息

Kirchhoff Carol F, Wang Xiao-Zhuo Michelle, Conlon Hugh D, Anderson Scott, Ryan Anne M, Bose Arindam

机构信息

Pfizer Inc, Global Technology Services, Biotechnology and Aseptic Sciences Group, Chesterfield, Missouri.

Pfizer Inc, BioTherapeutics Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pearl River, New York.

出版信息

Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017 Dec;114(12):2696-2705. doi: 10.1002/bit.26438. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

Abstract

A biosimilar drug is defined in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance document as a biopharmaceutical that is highly similar to an already licensed biologic product (referred to as the reference product) notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components and for which there are no clinically meaningful differences in purity, potency, and safety between the two products. The development of biosimilars is a challenging, multistep process. Typically, the assessment of similarity involves comprehensive structural and functional characterization throughout the development of the biosimilar in an iterative manner and, if required by the local regulatory authority, an in vivo nonclinical evaluation, all conducted with direct comparison to the reference product. In addition, comparative clinical pharmacology studies are conducted with the reference product. The approval of biosimilars is highly regulated although varied across the globe in terms of nomenclature and the precise criteria for demonstrating similarity. Despite varied regulatory requirements, differences between the proposed biosimilar and the reference product must be supported by strong scientific evidence that these differences are not clinically meaningful. This review discusses the challenges faced by pharmaceutical companies in the development of biosimilars.

摘要

在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的指导文件中,生物类似药被定义为一种生物制药产品,它与已获许可的生物制品(称为参比产品)高度相似,尽管其临床无活性成分存在细微差异,并且两种产品在纯度、效力和安全性方面不存在临床意义上的差异。生物类似药的研发是一个具有挑战性的多步骤过程。通常,相似性评估涉及在生物类似药的整个研发过程中以迭代方式进行全面的结构和功能表征,并且如果当地监管机构有要求,还需进行体内非临床评估,所有这些都与参比产品进行直接比较。此外,还要与参比产品开展比较临床药理学研究。尽管全球在命名法和证明相似性的精确标准方面存在差异,但生物类似药的批准受到严格监管。尽管监管要求各不相同,但拟议的生物类似药与参比产品之间的差异必须有强有力的科学证据支持,证明这些差异没有临床意义。本综述讨论了制药公司在生物类似药研发过程中面临的挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6313/5698755/d2d83d399c6f/BIT-114-2696-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools.
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017 Dec;114(12):2696-2705. doi: 10.1002/bit.26438. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
2
Biosimilars: A consideration of the regulations in the United States and European union.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
3
FDA's Approach to Regulating Biosimilars.
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):1882-1885. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1354. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
4
A Systematic Review of U.S. Biosimilar Approvals: What Evidence Does the FDA Require and How Are Manufacturers Responding?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Dec;23(12):1234-1244. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.12.1234.
5
Development of biosimilars.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Apr;45(5 Suppl):S11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
The complexities of biosimilars and the regulatory approval process.
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jun;24(11 Suppl):S231-S236.
7
Biosimilar safety factors in clinical practice.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Jun;44(6 Suppl):S9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.04.005.
8
Clinical considerations for the development of biosimilars in oncology.
MAbs. 2015;7(2):286-93. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2015.1008346.
9
Biosimilars: Here and Now.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e151-7. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_155954.
10
The US approach to biosimilars: the long-awaited FDA approval pathway.
BioDrugs. 2012 Dec 1;26(6):357-61. doi: 10.2165/11635830-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Biosimilars for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis.
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2025 Aug 18;15:401-410. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S510156. eCollection 2025.
4
Biochemical and Biophysical Divergences between Two l-Asparaginase II Variants: Potential for Using EcA2-K12 as a Biosimilar.
Biochemistry. 2025 Jul 15;64(14):3015-3029. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.4c00663. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
7
Hallmarks of Polymersome Characterization.
ACS Mater Au. 2024 Dec 23;5(2):223-230. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00107. eCollection 2025 Mar 12.
8
Biosimilars: A Critical Review of Development, Regulatory Landscape, and Clinical Implications.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2025 Jan 27;26(1):46. doi: 10.1208/s12249-025-03038-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten years of biosimilars in Europe: development and evolution of the regulatory pathways.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 May 16;11:1509-1515. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S130318. eCollection 2017.
2
A practical guide about biosimilar data for health care providers treating inflammatory diseases.
Biologics. 2017 Feb 24;11:13-21. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S122335. eCollection 2017.
3
Analytical Similarity Assessment in Biosimilar Studies.
AAPS J. 2016 May;18(3):670-7. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9882-5. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Key strategic factors for stakeholders in the current global biosimilar market.
Drug Discov Today. 2016 Feb;21(2):208-11. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
5
Development of biosimilars in an era of oncologic drug shortages.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Jun 24;9:3247-55. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S75219. eCollection 2015.
6
Biosimilars advancements: Moving on to the future.
Biotechnol Prog. 2015 Sep-Oct;31(5):1139-49. doi: 10.1002/btpr.2066. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Physicochemical characterization of Remsima.
MAbs. 2014;6(5):1163-77. doi: 10.4161/mabs.32221.
9
Contribution of animal studies to evaluate the similarity of biosimilars to reference products.
Drug Discov Today. 2015 Apr;20(4):483-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验