Lin Cheng-Hsien, Su Yi-Jiun, Hsu Chiann-Yi, Wang Po-Nan, Teng Chieh-Lin Jerry
Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2019 Aug;21(4):e13096. doi: 10.1111/tid.13096. Epub 2019 May 11.
Owing to the shortage of hematopoietic stem cells from matched sibling donors (MSD) and matched unrelated donors (MUD), the number of patients undergoing haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has rapidly increased. Despite a comparable overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival using this approach, some evidence suggests that haploidentical allo-HSCT recipients have a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, though this has not been clearly established.
This study retrospectively compared the cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia, 2-year OS, and leukemia-free survival rates in acute leukemia patients with MSD (n = 41), MUD (n = 18), and haploidentical donor allografts (n = 21).
The cumulative incidences of CMV DNAemia at day 180 in the MSD, MUD, and haploidentical groups were 39.0, 55.6, and 85.7%, respectively (P < 0.000). As less than 50% of patients in the MSD group were detected to have CMV DNAemia, the median time to CMV DNAemia detection in patients allografted with MSD could not be obtained. However, it was 42 and 29 days, respectively, for the MUD and haploidentical groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that haploidentical allo-HSCT (MSD vs. haploidentical: HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.09-0.78; P = 0.017) and age (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; P = 0.011) increased CMV infection. Finally, MSD, MUD, and haploidentical allo-HSCT provided comparable 2-year OS rates (52.1%, 65.5%, and 65.6%; P = 0.425) and 2-year leukemia-free survival rates (67.1%, 68.3%, and 80.7%, P = 0.837).
The CMV incidence was higher for haploidentical allo-HSCT than for MSD and MUD allo-HSCT; this could be explained by graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis by multiple immunosuppressants.
由于来自匹配同胞供者(MSD)和匹配无关供者(MUD)的造血干细胞短缺,接受单倍体相合异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)的患者数量迅速增加。尽管采用这种方法的总生存率(OS)和无白血病生存率相当,但一些证据表明,单倍体相合allo-HSCT受者的巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染发生率较高,不过这一点尚未明确证实。
本研究回顾性比较了MSD(n = 41)、MUD(n = 18)和单倍体相合供者异基因移植(n = 21)的急性白血病患者中CMV血症的累积发生率、2年OS率和无白血病生存率。
MSD组、MUD组和单倍体相合组在第180天时CMV血症的累积发生率分别为39.0%、55.6%和85.7%(P < 0.000)。由于MSD组中检测到CMV血症的患者不到50%,因此无法获得接受MSD移植患者CMV血症检测的中位时间。然而,MUD组和单倍体相合组分别为42天和29天。多因素分析显示,单倍体相合allo-HSCT(MSD与单倍体相合比较:HR:0.26;95%CI:0.09 - 0.78;P = 0.017)和年龄(HR:1.03;95%CI:1.01 - 1.06;P = 0.011)会增加CMV感染。最后,MSD、MUD和单倍体相合allo-HSCT的2年OS率相当(52.1%、65.5%和65.6%;P = 0.425),2年无白血病生存率也相当(67.1%、68.3%和80.7%,P = 0.837)。
单倍体相合allo-HSCT的CMV发生率高于MSD和MUD allo-HSCT;这可能是由于多种免疫抑制剂预防移植物抗宿主病所致。