Department of International Business, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jul;58(1):1-10.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
Promoting patient value-concordant end-of-life care is a priority in health care systems but has rarely been examined in randomized clinical trials.
To examine the effectiveness of an advance care planning intervention in facilitating concordance between cancer patients' preferred and received life-sustaining treatment (LST) states and to explore modifiable factors facilitating or impeding such concordance.
Terminal cancer patients (N = 460) were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental and control arms of a randomized clinical trial, with 430 deceased participants comprising the final sample. States of preferred LSTs (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intensive care unit care, chest compression, intubation with mechanical ventilation, intravenous nutrition, and nasogastric tube feeding) and LSTs received in the last month were examined by hidden Markov modeling. Concordance and its modifiable predictors were evaluated by kappa and multivariate logistic regression, respectively.
We identified three LST-preference states (uniformly preferring LSTs, rejecting LSTs except intravenous nutrition support, and mixed LST preferences) and three received LST states (uniformly receiving LSTs, received intravenous nutrition only, and selectively receiving LSTs). Concordance was not significantly higher in the experimental than the control arm (kappa [95% CI]: 0.126 [0.032, 0.221] vs. 0.050 [-0.028, 0.128]; arm difference: odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.008 [0.675, 1.5001]). Preferred-received LST-state concordance was facilitated by accurate prognostic awareness, better quality of life, and more depressive symptoms, whereas concordance was impeded by more anxiety symptoms.
Our advance care planning intervention did not facilitate concordance between terminally ill cancer patients' preferred and received LST states, but patient value-concordant end-of-life care may be facilitated by interventions to cultivate accurate prognostic awareness, improve quality of life, support depressive patients, and clarify anxious patients' overexpectations of LST efficacy.
在医疗体系中,促进以患者价值为导向的临终关怀是当务之急,但在随机临床试验中很少进行研究。
本研究旨在探讨预先医疗计划干预对促进癌症患者预期与实际接受的生命支持治疗(LST)状态之间的一致性的效果,并探讨促进或阻碍这种一致性的可调节因素。
将 460 名终末期癌症患者随机分为实验组和对照组,在一项随机临床试验中进行 1:1 分配,430 名已故参与者构成最终样本。采用隐马尔可夫模型对患者首选 LST 状态(心肺复苏、重症监护病房治疗、胸部按压、插管机械通气、静脉营养和鼻胃管喂养)和最后一个月接受的 LST 状态进行评估。采用 Kappa 分析和多变量逻辑回归分别评估一致性及其可调节预测因子。
我们确定了三种 LST 偏好状态(一致偏好 LST、除静脉营养支持外均拒绝 LST 和混合 LST 偏好)和三种接受 LST 状态(一致接受 LST、仅接受静脉营养和有选择地接受 LST)。实验组与对照组的一致性并无显著差异(Kappa [95% CI]:0.126 [0.032, 0.221] vs. 0.050 [-0.028, 0.128];手臂差异:比值比 [95% CI]:1.008 [0.675, 1.5001])。准确的预后意识、更好的生活质量和更多的抑郁症状促进了偏好与接受 LST 状态的一致性,而更多的焦虑症状则阻碍了一致性。
本预先医疗计划干预并未促进终末期癌症患者预期与接受的 LST 状态之间的一致性,但通过干预来培养准确的预后意识、提高生活质量、支持抑郁患者和明确患者对 LST 疗效的过高期望,可能有助于实现以患者价值为导向的临终关怀。