Radcliff Elizabeth, Crouch Elizabeth, Strompolis Melissa, Srivastav Aditi
Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Rural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 220 Stonebridge Drive, Suite 204, Columbia, SC, 29210, USA.
Children's Trust of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Jun;23(6):811-820. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-02698-w.
Objectives Research on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) has provided a valuable framework for understanding associations between childhood maltreatment and family dysfunction and later poor health outcomes. However, increasing research suggests the number and types of childhood adversities measured warrants further examination. This study examines ACE exposure among adults who experienced homelessness in childhood, another type of childhood adversity. Methods This cross-sectional, descriptive study used the 2016 South Carolina (SC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey and additional ACE modules to examine ACE exposure among SC adults and childhood homelessness. Standard descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. Bivariate analysis compared types and number of ACEs by childhood homeless status. All analyses used survey sampling weights that accounted for the BRFSS sampling strategy. Results Data from 7490 respondents were weighted for analyses. Among the 215 respondents who reported homelessness in childhood, 68.1% reported experiencing four or more ACEs. In contrast, only 16.3% of respondents who reported no homelessness in childhood reported experiencing four or more ACEs. The percent of respondents was significantly higher for each of 11 ACEs among those who reported childhood homelessness, compared to those who did not. Conclusions for Practice Adults who reported homelessness in childhood also reported significantly greater exposure to higher numbers and types of ACEs than adults reporting no childhood homelessness. Study findings can be important in informing additional indicators important to the assessment of ACEs and to program developers or organizations that provide housing assistance to at-risk families and children.
目标 关于童年不良经历(ACEs)的研究为理解童年期虐待、家庭功能障碍与后期不良健康结局之间的关联提供了一个有价值的框架。然而,越来越多的研究表明,所测量的童年逆境的数量和类型值得进一步研究。本研究调查了童年时期经历过无家可归的成年人中的ACE暴露情况,这是另一种童年逆境类型。方法 这项横断面描述性研究使用了2016年南卡罗来纳州(SC)行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)调查以及额外的ACE模块,以调查SC成年人中的ACE暴露情况和童年无家可归情况。对每个变量计算标准描述性统计量。双变量分析按童年无家可归状况比较了ACEs的类型和数量。所有分析都使用了考虑BRFSS抽样策略的调查抽样权重。结果 对7490名受访者的数据进行加权分析。在报告童年时期无家可归的215名受访者中,68.1%报告经历过四种或更多的ACEs。相比之下,童年时期未报告无家可归的受访者中只有16.3%报告经历过四种或更多的ACEs。与未报告童年无家可归的受访者相比,报告童年无家可归的受访者中11种ACEs中的每一种的比例都显著更高。实践结论 报告童年时期无家可归的成年人也报告说,与未报告童年无家可归的成年人相比,他们接触到的ACEs数量更多、类型更多。研究结果对于确定对ACEs评估重要的其他指标以及为有风险的家庭和儿童提供住房援助的项目开发者或组织可能具有重要意义。