Suppr超能文献

肩峰标志物聚类(AMC)在临床人群中的效用。

The utility of the acromion marker cluster (AMC) in a clinical population.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

School of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2022 Feb;62:102298. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The acromion marker cluster (AMC) is a non-invasive scapular motion tracking method. However, it lacks testing in clinical populations, where unique challenges may present. This investigation resolved the utility of the AMC approach in a compromised clinical population.

METHODS

The upper body of breast cancer survivors (BCS) and controls were tracked via motion capture and scapular landmarks palpated and recorded using a digitizer at static neutral to maximum elevation postures. The AMC tracked the scapula during dynamic maximum arm abduction. Both single (SC) and double calibration (DC) methods were applied to calculate scapular angles. The influences of calibration method, elevation, and group on mean and absolute error with two-way fixed ANOVAs with interactions (p < 0.05). Root mean square errors (RMSE) were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

DC improved AMC estimation of palpated scapular orientation over SC, especially at higher arm elevations; RMSE averaged 11° higher for SC than DC at maximum elevation, but the methods were only 2.2° different at 90° elevation. DC of the AMC yielded mean error values of ∼5-10°. These approximate errors reported for AMC with young, lean adults.

CONCLUSIONS

The AMC with DC is a non-invasive method with acceptable error for measuring scapular motion of BCS and age-matched controls.

摘要

简介

肩峰标志物集群(AMC)是一种非侵入性的肩胛骨运动跟踪方法。然而,它在临床人群中缺乏测试,因为在临床人群中可能会出现独特的挑战。本研究旨在解决 AMC 方法在受损临床人群中的实用性问题。

方法

通过运动捕捉对乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)和对照组的上半身进行跟踪,同时使用数字化仪在静态中立位到最大抬高位时触诊和记录肩胛骨的标志点。AMC 在动态最大手臂外展过程中跟踪肩胛骨。分别使用单(SC)和双(DC)校准方法来计算肩胛骨角度。使用双向固定方差分析(ANOVA)和交互作用(p < 0.05)来分析校准方法、抬高角度和组对平均和绝对误差的影响。计算并比较均方根误差(RMSE)。

结果

与 SC 相比,DC 提高了 AMC 对触诊肩胛骨方向的估计,尤其是在较高的手臂抬高角度下;在最大抬高角度下,SC 的 RMSE 比 DC 平均高 11°,但在 90°抬高角度下,两种方法仅相差 2.2°。AMC 的 DC 产生的平均误差值约为 5-10°。这些是针对年轻、瘦的成年人使用 AMC 报告的近似误差。

结论

使用 DC 的 AMC 是一种非侵入性方法,用于测量 BCS 和年龄匹配对照组的肩胛骨运动,其误差可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验